Originally Posted by AxelWolf View Post
Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
1.) Mdawg release Wizard, Michael Shackleford from the NDA, so that Shackleford a respected gambling expert can give his opinion on various subject involving Mdawgs claims and answer various questions involving these claims and I will prove some things to Dan Druff that several people here have been demanding that I prove, even though I am opposed to this on principal.

2.) Mdawg release Wizard from the DNA so he can say what he thinks and answer questions and I will join Mdawg, Wizard and Axelwolf, who I know has many of the same questions on Wizards stream or podcast or whatever you call it. And we will just see who knows what they are talking about.

3). I accept Mdawg Challenge in principle except I am not interested in focusing on any one specific session. I am interested in longer term. Mdawg's challenge says he will prove to the challengers satisfaction. Well my satisfaction can't be met with win statements or casino records that can be doctored. My satisfaction involved someone I know and trust (possibly myself) witnessing and maybe recording a months' worth of Mdawg play and lets just see if it matches or even comes close to matching any months worth of play he has claimed over the last 5 years.

These challenges are all fair. I am giving up something I am opposed to in two of them. The third I am agreeing to Mdawgs terms, just on a longer month long period instead of individual session.

Let's see if he is man enough to accept any? I made this an individual thread so I can periodically bump it to remind of his cowardness to accept.

Edit: I would accept Dan Druff's radio show as an alternative to Wizards stream, although I would like Wizard to be free to participate and express his opinions, which he has been restricted from doing. maybe we can get Mike and Axelwolf, along with Mdawg and myself on Druff's show. That way no one need show their face. I am sure details can be worked out.
It seems unlikely that an interview that wasn't done in person would bear any fruit. At best it would possibly divulge some things that don't make sense. But what good is that? There are already many things that don't make sense, but it still hasn't proven anything either way. They can always mask, backtrack, or cover that up with more BS. There's examples of this already. 60 "some" hands of blackjack in a row.

To really debunk someone or something in a situation like this, you really need an in-person interview where the interviewee is willing to participate in whatever challenges that are presented at the time.
Mike's stream is face to face. I would be willing to work something out. I think we could reach an agreement acceptable to everyone. Well except Mdawg. He simply can't have this go down because it would be the end of the Mdawg fantasy story. So I dont expect he will agree to anything. Instead he will just call people homeless, and drunks, and drug addicts, and "wizard's memory isn't good". Whatever he has to, to discredit anyone challenging his claims. THAT has been his play for a year now.