kewlJ

[kewlJ]

I have had many conversations with blackjack players discussing the most wins in a row. Their claim is usually 12-15 neighborhood. But any number above 15 is probably not only incorrect, whether intentionally so or just selective memory, but also puts the entire claim in the arena of 18 y.o. in a row meaning nonsense.

"The marathon session lasted 12 hours and contained all the ebb and flow of a typical blackjack game. Until, that is, Johnson was able to string together a streak of astronomical odds — taking more than 40 hands in row, according to a source."

https://nypost.com/2011/06/12/the-ta...-atlantic-city

Really??!! You are quoting the New York Post, a publication right there neck and neck with the National Enquire. And even better an unnamed source for the New York Post.

How about you ask freaking Don Johnson if he won 40 hands in a row?

And by the way, there were probably a dozen sets of eyes belonging to Casino personnel watching. Don't you think one of those folks would have verified this? Even though the rebate was a bad deal for the casino and someone got fired over it, 40 winning hands in a row is just the kind of thing the casino would verify and probably put it on billboards and commercials. Hey come play blackjack at Tropicana and you too could win 40 hands in a row.

It is funny how coach belly is always there to push these ridiculous claims. Anything Singer or Mdawg claims. Belly: "sure that could happen". 18 y.o. in a row. Belly: "sure that could happen". 40 straight wins at blackjack: Belly "sure that could happen". And that despite it being a 47 Quadrillion to 1 shot. Quadtrillion!!