The end-terms, 235 ---> [50 / (2 + 3)] = 10, and, 370 ---> [0 / (3 + 7)] = 0, likely have to do with how the sequences {10, 12, 22, 33, and 43}, from the thus protons, and, {0, 12, 22, 44, and 88}, from the thus neutrons, shift to the regular sequences, {00, 11, 22, 33, and 44}, and {1, 11, 22, 44, and 88}, respectively. In the first sequence, the only correct term is the 22, but, in the second sequence, the only wrong term is the 12.
The regular sequence, {00, 11, 22, 33, and 44}, goes to 0 by subtracting 11 from the 44, until reach 0. And, the regular sequence, {1, 11, 22, 44, and 88} goes to 1 by dividing 88 by 2, until reach 11, at which point division by two means to overlap the 1's of 11, to 1. Things don't stop at 11, to go (11 / 2), (11 / 4), and so on, on the way to 0 ... not in the real world. In fact, my method has to do with how one type of numeral, like the dimensions, grows out of another. Say, how the irrational numbers grow out of the integers/fractions, and, the two sets lead to the real numbers. It's not about going from dimension A, to B, by associating thus with the numeral, 0.5.
In other words, the first sequence requires a way to make 00, from 10, and, the second sequence requires a way to make 1, from 0. Antilog(0^0) makes 00, from 10, and, 0^0 makes 1, from 0. Sort of the two sides of 0^0 as 0, or 1.
I have other things to do, for a while, but, as noted in a previous post, the 2440-term, which corresponds to the 177-term, with the 00113377 ---> (0^0 + 1^1 + 3^3 + 7^7) forms in between, will be a great spot to pick things up. The 177 = (2^7 + 7^2), and, in a removed way, 177 ---> (3^6 - 6^3), resembles the form, (0^0 + 1^1 + 3^3 + 7^7), but, the 2442 resembles the form, 00113377, in how the digits involve, or not, operators, and, then, how the digits are no longer paired, but broken apart as 27_72, and 24_42 (instead of 22_77, and 22_44). So that he numerals may confirm the numbers of the physics, by moving beyond the underlying method insofar as the same method yielding such seemingly unrelated shifts in the numerals.
I already have things fairly under control with the fine-structure constants, including the sets from the other universe(s), but, I wanted to get as good a handle on also the underlying physics. So, I'm not too concerned that the above numerals, too, won't come around. It's just a matter of finding the time to go the remainder of the way.
Oh, while it's on my mind, the question of how many neutrons by element-290. My guess, for now, is that it's something like 426, from (371 + 54) = 425, which, plus 1, is 426, but, which may seem a bit low. Think of it along the lines of (235 + 54) = 290, and, then, (370 + 54) = 424, and, 290*2 = 10*(42 + 2^4)*1 ---> 142_241 . Noooooobbbbooddy is trying to even estimate such. Ha. And, interestingly, (426 - 290) = 136 = (-1 + 137) ---> 1/137 .
Reply With Quote