Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
Originally Posted by smurgerburger View Post
But as I indicated, the post was a response to Mickey's belief that nobody really believes KJ is a fake. It was not offered as an argument for KJ being fake.
Had you simply said "I for one believe he's a fake" then yes, you'd have offered no argument but you went further and DID argue, boldily decreeing that "none of the people that believe he is real have any evidence for it beyond that they find his BJ stories persuasive."

We view the same evidence and draw different conclusions; absent definitive proof your view is no more correct than mine.

In the end whether you believe KJ's tales is akin to whether you believe in God, as there is no real proof out there onw way or the other for either proposition.
The purpose of that remark, as the context might suggest, was to point out that the claim in question, that nobody really disbelieves KJ, even if it were true would not actually constitute any evidence that KJ is legit.

You apparently think the only evidence of KJ being a fraud is the absence of evidence that he is legit, on which point I would suggest a closer review of the evidence.