Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
That's a good point. BJ machines shuffle after each hand, similar to vp machines, so there is never a good or bad count. Yet he continued to base his "inquiries" as if there were no shuffle--as in a live game.

Oops....again! This is something kew didn't consider when he fabricated his "glitched machine" story.
Rob, there have been versions of video blackjack that were not shuffle after every hand. The Dealers Angels you've read about here was on of them. It was 4 decks and it would deal 80 cards before shuffling. Once 80 cards were out you could see the dealer in the screen shuffling the cards. It was a countable game with a bet spread of $1 to $100.

I played it at Deadwood Grand. It may still be in Pioneer Laughlin. It was in a few remote places in New Mexixo. I'm sure other places in U.S. had it.

The countable blackjack consoles go back a lot of years. I remember one version that got crushed back about 1999. It was countable with deep penetration.
So this is an IGT machine? (or another major manufacturer). Would one of them release a new machine these days that don't shuffle until 80 cards are dealt?

Either way, major machine providers would react immediately once a casino reported a possible glitch. No way they'd allow teams of AP to continue raping them while they do nothing. And releasing just 28 machines that only kew had knowledge of?

What are the odds....if any.