Quick Note for Todd

[redietz]

The amount of disrespect Redietz spews along with his obvious desire to be respected is phenomenal.

LOL. The amount of unparalleled arrogance, without documented results, without verifiable history, shown by people like you and mickey vis-a-vis sports betting, is off the charts. You don't know anything, but you decide who does. It's flat-out ridiculous. You haven't done anything, and you think you know who has.

It's incredible, really, An indictment of the AP arrogance. You guys....do you really think any sports book manager cares what teams "Stanford Wong" is betting tomorrow? Yet someone like Jay Kornegay (next to be inducted into the "Sports Betting Hall of Fame") entered the bowl game version of the private LineMasters Contest, which I have won and "my co-host" has dominated, just to see who in that contest was taking whom in advance of the bowl games. He entered as "Korndog," if anyone is interested.

There is an entire world you know nothing about. And yet you think you are expert. Truly bizarre.

All these whizbang APs winning at sports betting. yet the biggest sports bettor in Las Vegas history hired none of them. I guess he didn't know enough. Didn't have the resources, experience, or judgement to figure it all out. He should just have asked mickey crimm and accountinquestion.

[mickeycrimm]

The amount of disrespect Redietz spews along with his obvious desire to be respected is phenomenal.

LOL. The amount of unparalleled arrogance, without documented results, without verifiable history, shown by people like you and mickey vis-a-vis sports betting, is off the charts. You don't know anything, but you decide who does. It's flat-out ridiculous. You haven't done anything, and you think you know who has.

It's incredible, really, An indictment of the AP arrogance. You guys....do you really think any sports book manager cares what teams "Stanford Wong" is betting tomorrow? Yet someone like Jay Kornegay (next to be inducted into the "Sports Betting Hall of Fame") entered the bowl game version of the private LineMasters Contest, which I have won and "my co-host" has dominated, just to see who in that contest was taking whom in advance of the bowl games. He entered as "Korndog," if anyone is interested.

There is an entire world you know nothing about. And yet you think you are expert. Truly bizarre.

All these whizbang APs winning at sports betting. yet the biggest sports bettor in Las Vegas history hired none of them. I guess he didn't know enough. Didn't have the resources, experience, or judgement to figure it all out. He should just have asked mickey crimm and accountinquestion.

Keep conflating and obfuscating. That's what you are good at. Meanwhile at least one state gaming commision wants to know why the books increase limits for sucker bettors and decrease limits for winning bettors. The sports book execs are hiding under their desks.

What Massachusetts is doing is just the tip of the iceberg. State gaming commisions are going to pick up on the fact that limiting the winning bettors to nothing will drive them to illegal books.

https://massgaming.com/wp-content/up...21.24-OPEN.pdf

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/551...books-opt-out/

https://www.oddstrader.com/news/mass...etting-limits/

Redietz, your argument about track records and anonymity flies in the face of winning sportsbettors not wanting to expose themselves and their winning ways. So conflate on, dude.

PS, you are one stupid dude for claiming that we are claiming to be experts. It's an out and out bald face lie by a lying liar. Plain out misrepresentation by a lying liar.

[redietz]

And mickey, you should visit LV in a week. Dr. Beck taught college probability for the social sciences, so you could discuss some math issues with him that I'm too dumb to handle.

No, don't thank me. I'm always happy to put great minds in touch with each other.

But let me get you to clarify one thing, mickey. I'm not a "math guy." Is Richard Munchkin, in your view, a "math guy?" What makes a "math guy?" Now, for example, I got a 740 on math SATs, and I review, lesson by lesson, a Texas college probability course each year. But I am no "math guy." Dr. Beck, a full professor, taught math-oriented courses for the social sciences, but I'm not sure that makes him a "math guy." Shackleford, who's not a full professor, taught similar courses. Is he a "math guy?" What makes a "math guy?"

The guy I go to for programming help got an 800 (perfect) on his math SATs and he does his own programming, and I think he has an MBA to boot. I suspect he's a "math guy." But I'm not sure he fits your definition, which I'm sure is much wiser than mine. Can you help me out with this? What is your definition of a math guy?

I'd hate for me to be consulting people who had perfect math SATs all these years, or who taught college probability, and discover that according to mickey crimm, they are NOT "math guys." Help me out, buddy.

I don't care about probability as it relates to social science. I only care about probability as it relates to gambling. It was dice gamblers asking questions to mathematicians that started the branch of mathematics known as probability theory. Probability is thoroughly rooted in gambling.

You are not a math guy because I have never seen you put up even one equation on this or any other forum, that pertains to gambling. All you've ever done is conflated about reading probability books and having friends with degree's in math. That don't cut it.

Richard Munchkin doesn't have to be the math guy. His running partner, James Grosjean is the math guy. The Grosjean Cup at the Blackjack Ball is named after him. He's banned from the gambling knowledge contest for winning to much. The guy can find edges where so called experts like you say they don't exist.

The Ball is not just about blackjack. Every form of gambling is represented. I would love for you to give a treatise at the Blackjack Ball on how EV doesn't apply to sports betting I think you will find some highly knowledgeable people that disagree with you.

I know what your response will be, "blackjack players don't know jackshit about sportsbetting." But there are lots of pro sports bettors at the Blackjack Ball. So find another obfuscation.

If you're not experts, why are you misleading readers? I could sit here and blather on about machine play all day like you blather about sports betting. If you'll notice, I don't. Why would I? I'm not qualified.

My only conclusion regarding why you type so much about something you don't know is that you like to see yourself type. Good hobby. But you should put that little footnote after each post -- * Not an expert. Very little experience. No corroborated history of winning at sports betting.

Not hard. Just use an asterisk.

[accountinquestion]

And mickey, you should visit LV in a week. Dr. Beck taught college probability for the social sciences, so you could discuss some math issues with him that I'm too dumb to handle.

No, don't thank me. I'm always happy to put great minds in touch with each other.

But let me get you to clarify one thing, mickey. I'm not a "math guy." Is Richard Munchkin, in your view, a "math guy?" What makes a "math guy?" Now, for example, I got a 740 on math SATs, and I review, lesson by lesson, a Texas college probability course each year. But I am no "math guy." Dr. Beck, a full professor, taught math-oriented courses for the social sciences, but I'm not sure that makes him a "math guy." Shackleford, who's not a full professor, taught similar courses. Is he a "math guy?" What makes a "math guy?"

The guy I go to for programming help got an 800 (perfect) on his math SATs and he does his own programming, and I think he has an MBA to boot. I suspect he's a "math guy." But I'm not sure he fits your definition, which I'm sure is much wiser than mine. Can you help me out with this? What is your definition of a math guy?

I'd hate for me to be consulting people who had perfect math SATs all these years, or who taught college probability, and discover that according to mickey crimm, they are NOT "math guys." Help me out, buddy.

I don't care about probability as it relates to social science. I only care about probability as it relates to gambling. It was dice gamblers asking questions to mathematicians that started the branch of mathematics known as probability theory. Probability is thoroughly rooted in gambling.

You are not a math guy because I have never seen you put up even one equation on this or any other forum, that pertains to gambling. All you've ever done is conflated about reading probability books and having friends with degree's in math. That don't cut it.

Richard Munchkin doesn't have to be the math guy. His running partner, James Grosjean is the math guy. The Grosjean Cup at the Blackjack Ball is named after him. He's banned from the gambling knowledge contest for winning to much. The guy can find edges where so called experts like you say they don't exist.

The Ball is not just about blackjack. Every form of gambling is represented. I would love for you to give a treatise at the Blackjack Ball on how EV doesn't apply to sports betting I think you will find some highly knowledgeable people that disagree with you.

I know what your response will be, "blackjack players don't know jackshit about sportsbetting." But there are lots of pro sports bettors at the Blackjack Ball. So find another obfuscation.

If you're not experts, why are you misleading readers? I could sit here and blather on about machine play all day like you blather about sports betting. If you'll notice, I don't. Why would I? I'm not qualified.

My only conclusion regarding why you type so much about something you don't know is that you like to see yourself type. Good hobby. But you should put that little footnote after each post -- * Not an expert. Very little experience. No corroborated history of winning at sports betting.

Not hard. Just use an asterisk.

Were not experts you're just that big of a fool.