Originally Posted by Don Perignom View Post
Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
But seriously, not to attack shackleford, but isn't there a case to be made that he harms AP's?
Obviously.

I'm not the information sharing police, but it's not necessary to hype the opportunities the way he does.

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
Ditz disputes the "at least 30% edge" Shack claimed. Ditz says he absolutely knows that's to high. Yet the empirical evidence is that in the 4 years Shack did it his lowest year was 172% return.
He didn't have a 72% edge.
Not the point. He exceeded the “at least 30%” he said it was worth. Actually doubled it.