kewlJ

[jdog]

Now compare that to me and my 20 year story.

I mean it's a great story that you repeat endlessly. I'm not trolling you (not that you could tell the difference), but the bottom line is I just simply believe what MDawg has posted is more plausible in it's totality. Unlike you, I have the ability to understand that there are things I don't know that others possibly do. I also have enough knowledge to understand how winning play could be tolerated under an arrangement. Not to mention the only thing you've EVER stated that has been corroborated is that you post from an IP address within Vegas.

Also you are not too bright, but you genuinely believe you know everything about APing and casinos. A wise man knows there is much he doesn't know, but in you we have the unfortunate combination of being extremely self-righteous and unwise. For this I feel sorry for you.

But of course I'm just trolling you... and all the trolls deep down actually believe you, right? Total self-dilution. Have you ever considered you might be wrong about anything??

[kewlJ]

. I'm not trolling you.....Also you are not too bright,

I am not trolling you but you are not too bright. Really? I will stop there. I have something in your post to refute, but really while bother.

[Rob.Singer]

. I'm not trolling you.....Also you are not too bright,

I am not trolling you but you are not too bright. Really? I will stop there. I have something in your post to refute, but really while bother.

Tell us kew---exactly how much does it hurt every time a poster explains why mdawg is far more believable than you? (Psst....it happens quite often, bozo).

[coach belly]

I don't know exactly how many rounds it was. I said that from the day I first shared the story.

I quoted what you posted here about your "perfect shoe" story.

If you are referencing posts from somewhere else, well then that's just another one of your stories.

So you originally estimated the number of hands as 40, and then revised that number down twice in the last 24 hours.

How is that fundamentally different than MDawg's story and follow-up posts?

[Rob.Singer]

I don't know exactly how many rounds it was. I said that from the day I first shared the story.

I quoted what you posted here about your "perfect shoe" story.

If you are referencing posts from somewhere else, well then that's just another one of your stories.

So you originally estimated the number of hands as 40, and then revised that number down twice in the last 24 hours.

How is that fundamentally different than MDawg's story and follow-up posts?

Typical kew....typical liar. Get caught, change the story to a lie, then get caught again.

What a legacy.....

[kewlJ]

1-3-5

That would be the triple play the good guys just turned.

Coach Belly, I apologize for doing this, but you are going to need to go find your blood pressure meds and take an extra dose today. What I am about to do is going to cause you a coronary. I will wait a few minutes while you dig up the meds and take them, and give a few minutes to kick in. While we are waiting take some deep breaths. You are going to need them.

[kewlJ]

1-3-5

That would be the triple play the good guys just turned.

Coach Belly, I apologize for doing this, but you are going to need to go find your blood pressure meds and take an extra dose today. What I am about to do is going to cause you a coronary. I will wait a few minutes while you dig up the meds and take them, and give a few minutes to kick in. While we are waiting take some deep breaths. You are going to need them.

Ok, it has been 10 minutes or more. Are we ready? a couple more deep breaths Belly, just to be safe.

What if I amend my numbers to 30 wins out of 32? How would you feel about that? Deep Breaths, Belly, deep breaths.

I just went back and read the account of the "perfect Shoe" that I posted at WoV. In that account, I made reference to the number of hands twice.

1) "the other two players happened to drop out leaving me heads up with the dealer for about 30 rounds".

and 2) "Only odd thing is that in 30 some rounds with a very positive count, I received no blackjacks".

So going with "about 30 rounds" after I was heads up playing max bet and my supermax bet, lets say 30 of 32, maybe 29 of 31.

How are you feeling about that?

30 for 32 or 29 for 31 is a far cry from Mdawgs 60 straight BJ wins in a row isn't it? perhaps that is why Wizard said nothing. because while and unusual event, (which was why I shared) not some ridiculously astronomical odds that you are claiming.

So I do apologize for remembering those details incorrectly. It has been 13 years. I have played improbably 3000 days, and 15,000 shoes. I think the 35 rounds number I recently used probably included the 5 rounds or so, before I was playing max bet that includes some (maybe all) loses at minimum and smaller wagers.

Anyway, I did make a mistake in recalling the event. Can you possibly forgive me for remembering incorrectly? Please a few more deep breaths. I don't want to compound this mistake by being responsible for a fine human being like yourself experiencing a medical situation.

Thank you very little.

[kewlJ]

I'll tell you what it does do though. Remember all this bullshit we have heard started by Singer and repeated by Mdawg, about how I have "worn my story smooth" over the years? Well guess what, this proves, that is not the case. Unlike some here, I am not writing a fantastical fiction story. Just a player sharing some experiences that may occasionally remember something wrong.

So even when I make a mistake....I still win. I still beat the trolls and haters.

[coach belly]

How are you feeling about that?

I'm feeling that you have now revised the number of hands down about some 3 or 4 times in the last 24 hours.

It's devastating news, and...yikes!...right after I ran out of my BP meds.

Oh, what a world, what a world. Who would have thought that some little girl like you could destroy my beautiful wickedness.

[kewlJ]

Oh, what a world, what a world. Who would have thought that some little girl like you could destroy my beautiful wickedness.

If Only!!!! You are giving this little girl a hard on just thinking about your demise.

[coach belly]

What if I amend my numbers to 30 wins out of 32?

You probably think that your 30 "some" wins makes your story twice as believable as MDawg's "some" 60 wins.

So multiply how believable MDawg's story is by 2, and the product is your believability.

What did you come up with?

[kewlJ]

I am having a bad day on the online forums though. Besides, making an honest mistake remembering details form a session 13 years ago, I have wasted probably 2 hours over the last day and half fighting with a know-it-BJ player (or maybe spanish21) over at GF that had the gall to attack Don Schlesinger over the Illustrious 18 blackjack index plays. This clown wants to play 200 strategy change plays, which just might add about $1.37 to his pocket.

This reminded me of JSTAT attacking Thorp over a small mistake in beat the dealer. I tried hard to be respectful and carefully think out my replies trying to help him understand. And he just kept getting more obnoxious, insisting all the professional players were wrong and he was right. And all the while kept mentioning some count I had never heard of.

Finally, I googled the count he seemed to be promoting. It took me to threads at Norm's blackjack forum, and WoV, where he displayed the same obnoxious behavior, insisting he knew it all and ALL the real players, both Pro and recreational were wrong. BOTH threads ended with his banning.

Next reference took me to Amazon, where he is selling a self published book (shades of Rob) about his silly system, which I will not mention so as not to give him the publicity he seeks. In addition to selling his book at Amazon, he is a seller of many other different kinds of products. An online seller of many different products just screams successful advantage player doesn't it?

I would like to have the two hours or so that I put in earnestly trying to help this individual. What a waste these online forums are.

[smurgerburger]

I find quite consistently that those who most thrive on unmasking phony experts, or in general policing expertise, are themselves quite mediocre in the field in question. (Or complete frauds where that is possible). Come to think of it we can add redietz to the list.

Penn and Teller are an exception but I'm not sure if they really cared about unmasking fake psychics or if that was more just a way of promoting themselves.

[MDawg]

We have a fraudster thats been calling others fraudsters for quite awhile. WTF?

[MDawg]

As far as my winning session, I posted about the session and then OnceDear splintered the post off into its own thread. OD and not I created the thread title referring to 60 hands in a row. OD and I (and not Wizard) discussed what had happened and I clarified it all in September 2021, and re-summarized it all here in 2024:

https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gamb.../8/#post918839

I could produce the win record for the session, even after all this time. What was remarkable about it was that I ended up some sixty thousand ahead with an average bet (not counting doubles or splits) of around eight hundred.

By comparison, no amount of money (even free money for posting of a mere pic of a surfboard) will elicit the smallest bit of proof from the UNKewl one.

But for no payment at all, UNKewlJ will spend all day long on these forums lying through his teeth.

But I do know this, it is routine for tewlj to make shit up on the fly to push his false narratives. He'd rather climb to the top of a tree just to tell a lie than stand on the ground and tell the truth. So I call into question the "facts" tewlj attributed to MDawg's posts.

I don't have time to do it but I bet if I went over to WoV and read MDawg's thread, what MDawg actually wrote, and what tewlj says he wrote, are probably vastly different.

[Rob.Singer]

It is truly entertaining watching kew constantly going down in flames by not posting ANYTHING that will even remove one iota of doubt about his very flimsy claims.

Fraudster is right. He talks and talks and talks and talks and talks. Yet for as many times as he claims to have "documented proof" of a variety of his ridiculous claims, he also has a plethora of excuses as to why he's supposedly "protecting himself" by withholding so-called "proof".

That, in a nutshell, very accurately describes what lying is all about.

[MDawg]

I'm pretty sure you don't have a clue to the possibilities of what he is really doing. All you've done is spent years trying to discredit the guy without providing one ounce of proof beyond the obvious as to what is really going on.

One of the reasons I have always stayed out of the MDawg drama for the most part is because of the possibilities as to what is really going on.

Every now and then you get a new piece to the MDawg puzzle. Maybe one day it will be solved. But for now he has 10x more credibility than you. People know him, people have seen him play, he's actually profited from a non-believer, and has had no one step up to claim supposed free money if they don't believe a story told about a session or whatever.

Meanwhile you have absolutely nothing substantiated....RIP

the bottom line is I just simply believe what MDawg has posted is more plausible in it's totality. Unlike you, I have the ability to understand that there are things I don't know that others possibly do. I also have enough knowledge to understand how winning play could be tolerated under an arrangement. Not to mention the only thing you've EVER stated that has been corroborated is that you post from an IP address within Vegas.

Also you are not too bright, but you genuinely believe you know everything about APing and casinos. A wise man knows there is much he doesn't know, but in you we have the unfortunate combination of being extremely self-righteous and unwise. For this I feel sorry for you.

But of course I'm just trolling you... and all the trolls deep down actually believe you, right? Total self-dilution. Have you ever considered you might be wrong about anything??

I bring these up primarily because these are like knives being twisted in UNKewlJ's guts. And the fact that it bothers him so much, is most of the reason why he's not at all the type who could play low key in a casino the way he claims, and not get booted time and again for getting hysterical when things don't go his way. The REAL story behind how he got that black eye recently could give us some more insight.

[MDawg]

And there you have it....again and again and again! Kew repeatedly proves he just CANNOT stop reading forums he "vows" to be finished with, simply because he just HAS to see if anyone is saying anything that doesn't 100% jive with his completely made-up internet forum life.

You can just feel the squirmy uneasiness in his real life every time he's forced to do that, which for a weakling like him, is impossible to stop. Which as I've said many times, forever and readily explains how there is no way in hell that such a helpless little twit would ever have the required character and discipline to be the gunslinging bj player he purports to be. And he never does get how he exposes that in his myriad of postings

[MDawg]

I am having a bad day on the online forums though.

What's a good day, when people believe your nonsense?

The truth is … UNKewlJ hasn’t spent 20 years playing blackjack. He’s spent 20 years trying to convince people that he’s been playing blackjack.

[Garnabby]

Dawg's masterful mental manipulation of the quotes, on many levels, hasn't gone unnoticed. Ha.

It has gone unchecked. You all KNOW he manipulates your quotes and no one says anything. The only person to ever say anything was Axelwolf, who multiple times told Dawg to stop but was ignored.

It is just another form of Dawgs lying, which at this point he just does blatantly in every post, while people just chuckle.

The biggest offender by far is a guy that claims to be an attorney who took an oath not to behave in such a. manner.

I doubt that you'll, ever, figure out, even after I tell you, that just about every thing goes "over your head". And, not surprisingly, along with your forum "buddy". You guys simply aren't equipped with the mental horsepower, or drive, to achieve anything of note.

Well, I hope that V doesn't "take his ball, and, go home, again", because, as Tasha pointed out, MrV's posts are at least funny [in addition to simplistic]. Ha.