The end.

[Garnabby]

Druff I would love to know what you are thinking with this forum. When you bought it and took over, you said it was to preserve it and everything you have written. Are you really preserving this forum? Go back just 5 years and read some of the names that posted here. Some, not a lot, but some legit, AP's and players, most, driven away, or just had enough and left or post much less. I really don't get it Dan Druff. I can waste no more time in this shithole. But good luck to you.

The only word that caught my attention was, Druff.

KJ. I have no idea to whom you are talking, let alone going on about what. Were you in constant contact, with Druff, about the forum stuff? What will he do now that he didn't, before? And why write of not wasting time here?

I mean, just go, like your significant "forum buddy", MrV, as a form of psychological defense mechanism as if you were fundamentally better than the rest of us. My advice is to try to avoid people, get at least your own life under control.

Garnabby, do you believe free will is compatible with determinism?

Give up the strict, concept of one versus the other. The same as a point isn't really, in theory, or actually, in practice, such a point, say, of determinism.

Each, and every, dimension, as its own subset of physics/math, in a true dimensional equation, springs naturally from the absolute, which is all/no dimension(s). The first step, to form a point, say, like (levels of) infinitely compact/expansive "donuts" with their insides from the no-dimensional part, and, their outsides from the all-dimensional part.

Then, even though the set of dimensions that represent "determinism" (0 to 4, of charge as relative) is lower than the set of that represent "free will" (4 to 8, of gravity as quantum), with the latter set seemingly, but not, simply based on the former set, they are already related, by the "starting point" as the absolute as above.

I used to say that to combine the concepts of science, and, religion, I had to start from the science side of things. Here, I may say that I started from the deterministic side, with that language to express the rest, as a form of determinism that looks like free will. But, to truly get this to work, I now go with the above explanation. After all, those points above are required to make things work, not, some amorphous "foam", or "membrane", for space, and time, etc.