Most despised VCT member voting

[theywontpayontuesday]

So now theywontpay is starting multiple stupid threads instead of Tasha?

Stupid thread I don't think so, it has been a nice party.

[MHF]

So my money would be on UNKewl's getting the boot first.

Alan banned my ThomasClines account, for suggesting, along with Singer, that Alan had a gambling problem, and, Druff banned my OneHitWonder account, for posting up a picture of an "AP gun" with bent-backward barrel, in a newbie thread about the benefits of gambling. The latter OP, very likely, was the last bit of "fresh blood", before promptly "heading for the hills".

[theywontpayontuesday]

Up to now, results inconclusive. KewlJ hasn't voted and his vote could turn the tide away from him and leave Rob Singer or Garnabby in the lead. It seems KewlJ would vote twice for Rob Singer and leave Rob Singer the most deployable of deplorables.

[Rob.Singer]

Up to now, results inconclusive. KewlJ hasn't voted and his vote could turn the tide away from him and leave Rob Singer or Garnabby in the lead. It seems KewlJ would vote twice for Rob Singer and leave Rob Singer the most deployable of deplorables.

And I would enjoy such a scenario. Agitating the little people around here with the Undeniable Truth is my specialty!

[accountinquestion]

Up to now, results inconclusive. KewlJ hasn't voted and his vote could turn the tide away from him and leave Rob Singer or Garnabby in the lead. It seems KewlJ would vote twice for Rob Singer and leave Rob Singer the most deployable of deplorables.

And I would enjoy such a scenario. Agitating the little people around here with the Undeniable Truth is my specialty!

Talking about your grandkids that haven't moved out yet.

[theywontpayontuesday]

Up to now, results inconclusive. KewlJ hasn't voted and his vote could turn the tide away from him and leave Rob Singer or Garnabby in the lead. It seems KewlJ would vote twice for Rob Singer and leave Rob Singer the most deployable of deplorables.

And I would enjoy such a scenario. Agitating the little people around here with the Undeniable Truth is my specialty!

You are fucked up in your head. You are the ultimate little person, you may as well welcome us all to Munchkin land and park the Newell up your butt.

[Tasha]

I still don't get how Garnabby got SIC votes for most Despised VCT Member. The ONLY things that Posters don't like about Garnabby is his hijacking threads with anagrams and numerology. Nothing too bad like Doxxing Posters or insulting them.

[DGenBen]

I still don't get how Garnabby got SIC votes for most Despised VCT Member. The ONLY things that Posters don't like about Garnabby is his hijacking threads with anagrams and numerology. Nothing too bad like Doxxing Posters or insulting them.

I can answer that for you - Africa anus noteworthy

2348 314 47 19 3 5 7 11 13 17 19 21 23 29 47 31 119

[MDawg]

Title at a quick glance reads as

Poll: Most depressed VCT member voting -

which would of course be UNKewlJ.

Get help.

[MHF]

I still don't get how Garnabby got SIC votes for most Despised VCT Member. The ONLY things that Posters don't like about Garnabby is his hijacking threads with anagrams and numerology. Nothing too bad like Doxxing Posters or insulting them.

I can answer that for you - Africa anus noteworthy

2348 314 47 19 3 5 7 11 13 17 19 21 23 29 47 31 119

Tasha, every one in here is slip, sliding away at the "game of life". So, it's not really, in theory, or, actually, in practice, the anagrams with gematria that frightens them, but, someone with other plans.

---> The Great Derangement: A Terrifying True Story of War, Politics, & Religion at the Twilight of the American Empire.

https://anagram-solver.net/Tashaever...s?partial=true

Taibbi discusses 9/11 conspiracy theories as symptomatic of what he calls the "derangement" of American society; a disconnection from reality due to widespread "disgust with our political system". Drawing a parallel with the charismatic movement, he argues that both "chose to battle bugbears that were completely idiotic, fanciful, and imaginary", instead of taking control of their own lives. While critical, Taibbi explains that 9/11 conspiracy theories are different from "Clinton-era black-helicopter paranoia", and constitute more than "a small, scattered group of nutcases ... they really were, just as they claim to be, almost everyone you meet."

[DGenBen]

Tasha, every one in here is slip, sliding away at the "game of life". So, it's not really, in theory, or, actually, in practice, the anagrams with gematria that frightens them, but, someone with other plans.

---> The Great Derangement: A Terrifying True Story of War, Politics, & Religion at the Twilight of the American Empire.

https://anagram-solver.net/Tashaever...s?partial=true

Taibbi discusses 9/11 conspiracy theories as symptomatic of what he calls the "derangement" of American society; a disconnection from reality due to widespread "disgust with our political system". Drawing a parallel with the charismatic movement, he argues that both "chose to battle bugbears that were completely idiotic, fanciful, and imaginary", instead of taking control of their own lives. While critical, Taibbi explains that 9/11 conspiracy theories are different from "Clinton-era black-helicopter paranoia", and constitute more than "a small, scattered group of nutcases ... they really were, just as they claim to be, almost everyone you meet."

Well I know this book argues that everyone now has an alternative reality, but you could argue that relativity of simultaneity is evidence that there really is no objective reality.

[pinchingyourballs]

Title at a quick glance reads as

Poll: Most depressed VCT member voting -

which would of course be UNKewlJ.

Get help.

It would be a tie between you and him.

[MHF]

---> The Great Derangement: A Terrifying True Story of War, Politics, & Religion at the Twilight of the American Empire.

https://anagram-solver.net/Tashaever...s?partial=true

Taibbi discusses 9/11 conspiracy theories as symptomatic of what he calls the "derangement" of American society; a disconnection from reality due to widespread "disgust with our political system". Drawing a parallel with the charismatic movement, he argues that both "chose to battle bugbears that were completely idiotic, fanciful, and imaginary", instead of taking control of their own lives. While critical, Taibbi explains that 9/11 conspiracy theories are different from "Clinton-era black-helicopter paranoia", and constitute more than "a small, scattered group of nutcases ... they really were, just as they claim to be, almost everyone you meet."

Well I know this book argues that everyone now has an alternative reality, but you could argue that relativity of simultaneity is evidence that there really is no objective reality.

The nature of reality is that reality has no nature.

[theywontpayontuesday]

I suppose it is a surprise Mdawg got no votes. I have nothing against him besides I don't like how he always uses quotes in much excess considering they aren't a part of the current thread. I have never been very interested reading his threads about whatever he claims his life is
true or false I care less.

[DGenBen]

---> The Great Derangement: A Terrifying True Story of War, Politics, & Religion at the Twilight of the American Empire.

https://anagram-solver.net/Tashaever...s?partial=true

Well I know this book argues that everyone now has an alternative reality, but you could argue that relativity of simultaneity is evidence that there really is no objective reality.

The nature of reality is that reality has no nature.

But what’s the reality of nature? Is it better than nurture?

[MHF]

Well I know this book argues that everyone now has an alternative reality, but you could argue that relativity of simultaneity is evidence that there really is no objective reality.

The nature of reality is that reality has no nature.

But what’s the reality of nature? Is it better than nurture?

The latter involves a different definition of nature. In the sense that nor is reality nurtured.

[DGenBen]

The nature of reality is that reality has no nature.

But what’s the reality of nature? Is it better than nurture?

The latter involves a different definition of nature. In the sense that nor is reality nurtured.

This would be contrary to the premise of the book you mentioned, The Great Derangement, if I understand the premise correctly from reading the summary.

The book argues that Americans cannot agree on one reality or one set of objective facts.

So the book appears to be arguing that different versions of reality can be nurtured & that is the whole issue.

[MHF]

But what’s the reality of nature? Is it better than nurture?

The latter involves a different definition of nature. In the sense that nor is reality nurtured.

This would be contrary to the premise of the book you mentioned, The Great Derangement, if I understand the premise correctly from reading the summary.

The book argues that Americans cannot agree on one reality or one set of objective facts.

So the book appears to be arguing that different versions of reality can be nurtured & that is the whole issue.

Tasha, every one in here is slip, sliding away at the "game of life". So, it's not really, in theory, or, actually, in practice, the anagrams with gematria that frightens them, but, someone with other plans.

Ah, but, I have other plans. As someone who knows the true nature of reality.

[DGenBen]

The latter involves a different definition of nature. In the sense that nor is reality nurtured.

This would be contrary to the premise of the book you mentioned, The Great Derangement, if I understand the premise correctly from reading the summary.

The book argues that Americans cannot agree on one reality or one set of objective facts.

So the book appears to be arguing that different versions of reality can be nurtured & that is the whole issue.

Tasha, every one in here is slip, sliding away at the "game of life". So, it's not really, in theory, or, actually, in practice, the anagrams with gematria that frightens them, but, someone with other plans.

Ah, but, I have other plans. As someone who knows the true nature of reality.

But nobody knows the true nature of reality except for the true nature of reality to them specifically. If every human was completely colorblind except for one, then the one non colorblind person who perceived the sky as blue would be considered as someone out of touch with reality.

[MHF]

This would be contrary to the premise of the book you mentioned, The Great Derangement, if I understand the premise correctly from reading the summary.

The book argues that Americans cannot agree on one reality or one set of objective facts.

So the book appears to be arguing that different versions of reality can be nurtured & that is the whole issue.

Tasha, every one in here is slip, sliding away at the "game of life". So, it's not really, in theory, or, actually, in practice, the anagrams with gematria that frightens them, but, someone with other plans.

Ah, but, I have other plans. As someone who knows the true nature of reality.

But nobody knows the true nature of reality except for the true nature of reality to them specifically. If every human was completely colorblind except for one, then the one non colorblind person who perceived the sky as blue would be considered as someone out of touch with reality.

As out of touch, with reality, as to be back in touch, with reality. In other words, the original/final expression, theme, or dimension, of the universe must somehow overlay, or coincide with, the stuff of the universe; so as not to be yet another thus extension of it. The theory of everything already exists among us. Something new, from the old, which remains a part of each.