Originally Posted by
accountinquestion
It was tracking 3 tables. Now you're changing the story yet again.
No it wasn't tracking 3 tables. You are either mistaken or intentionally lying. 98% of the time tracking a second table involved tracking one other neighboring table than you were playing. I did say I had tracked 2 other tables but the times I did so had to be just right. Almost perfect, with two neighboring tables starting a new shuffle at exactly the same time while occupying the middle seat with an unobstructed view of each table. And even then, I could track both tables for only a couple rounds at best, at which point you would drop the least favorable table and continue tracking the better second opportunity. The times I tracked more than one second table I could count on my fingers....thats how infrequent it was. So just stop lying.