Rob I have a direct question about this particular hand: dealt three 3s with an ace. Why didn't you use your "special play" strategy and hold only the trip 3s while rationalizing that you then had two chances to draw the quad 3 plus you still could draw one of the three additional aces in the deck or one of the four 2s in the deck (a total of 7 kickers)???
In retrospect you might have played the correct strategy but your "special play strategy" still would have held up for this hand. Why did you divert from it??? I would like you to explain that in detail -- why the diversion from the Singer strategy?
What you did was in effect give yourself one chance to draw the one card for the big win, while the "special play" would have given you two chances to draw at least the quad card plus 7 remaining kickers. I think this is an inconsistency and you should explain it.
Please see the video I did with you about this exact "special play" which is #16 here:
http://alanbestbuys.com/id195.html