Bet on Kamala.....

[Rob.Singer]

.....and lose your ass. (Tasha, take note)

Not sure why asshats like Mark Cuban, Joy Reid, and Howard Stern don't get it yet, but they're in for a world of hurt in less than 2 weeks. I'm not saying that Trump will 100% actually make it to his Jan. swear-in ceremony because the Liberals in power just CANNOT allow him back into the White House to tear their corrupt playhouse down.

They WILL attempt to take him out again after he wins the election. Lets hope he makes it thru all the hate and lies. But if the savior of our country somehow continues to escape and defy, imagine the beautiful images on The View and MSNBC as they all down their cyanide capsules in glorious harmony, unable to cope with true decency being back in the Oval Office!

Yes libtards--fire up those pussified EV's, tighten up those old buttcheeks to hold those throbbing/bulging hemorrhoids in, and head on up to Canada for some safe-space blues.

It's gonna be F-U-N!!

[redietz]

LOL. Singer has done some decent writing in his life, but he may have topped himself in the paragraphs above.

I think Singer's a little too enthusiastic, but I'm the guy who listened to a Trump biography on tape while leisurely driving to the opening of the Taj Mahal back in whenever the hell it was (1990; I had to look it up). My compadre was the late Johny Mucha, who was a Trumpster fan. We rented a vehicle for the excursion, as damages were always a concern since we traveled a la Hunter Thompson (never stay in the same place more than two nights because one never knows who is following you).

Anyway, we were well aware of Trump's many foibles before the trip (such as his old man transferring money -- technically avoiding inheritance taxes -- into Don's name and things like the Trumpster calling in "anonymously" while discussing his own dating life on radio shows). My current better half was also privy to a call Trump made when trying to get a loan for a casino in LV. Very entertaining. Not exactly presidential, but what after all is "presidential?"

It is really quite a caveat against the current incarnation of the Dems that I, a dedicated socialist, strongly believe that the Trumpster is the only sane choice in a few weeks.

I will pay, as Singer said, to watch MSNBC on election night. I already have a few bucks on Mr. Trump, so the question is when and if I hedge.

On a serious note, it is really something that my intellectual position is that what has occurred recently vis-a-vis media and censorship and control is so insidious and far-reaching that my vote will go to Trump. But what I see from the "left" is worse than anything Orwell cooked up, and it'll just get worse, given the current trajectory.

[accountinquestion]

.....and lose your ass. (Tasha, take note)

Not sure why asshats like Mark Cuban, Joy Reid, and Howard Stern don't get it yet, but they're in for a world of hurt in less than 2 weeks. I'm not saying that Trump will 100% actually make it to his Jan. swear-in ceremony because the Liberals in power just CANNOT allow him back into the White House to tear their corrupt playhouse down.

They WILL attempt to take him out again after he wins the election. Lets hope he makes it thru all the hate and lies. But if the savior of our country somehow continues to escape and defy, imagine the beautiful images on The View and MSNBC as they all down their cyanide capsules in glorious harmony, unable to cope with true decency being back in the Oval Office!

Yes libtards--fire up those pussified EV's, tighten up those old buttcheeks to hold those throbbing/bulging hemorrhoids in, and head on up to Canada for some safe-space blues.

It's gonna be F-U-N!!

I didn't realize this is your stupid.

These clowns were all TDS TDS then after all the shit that has happened, no one would be motivated to take Trump out on their own. Never has there been a President so devisive.

[redietz]

Just because somebody wears a nametag that says "divisive" doesn't mean, objectively, that that person is the "most divisive." Maybe "most unapologetically divisive" would work, or maybe "called 'most divisive'" would be true, but superficial respectful words (aka "Singing Kumbaya") are no measure of divisive effects.

Hard to imagine anyone more "divisive" policy-wise than Lyndon Johnson. Hard to imagine anyone with more flashpoint "divisiveness" than Nixon. Carter created massive divisiveness while serving as a perfect example of textbook morals, honesty, and Christian values, which led to his landslide loss in the first election since 1932 in which an incumbent was beaten.

I think the labeling of Trump as "divisive" serves as little purpose as criticizing Jerry Springer for being "divisive" on his show. The divisions aren't about Trump or Springer. Those guys are just making a career out of riding the wave better than anybody else.