Bet on Kamala.....

[Rob.Singer]

.....and lose your ass. (Tasha, take note)

Not sure why asshats like Mark Cuban, Joy Reid, and Howard Stern don't get it yet, but they're in for a world of hurt in less than 2 weeks. I'm not saying that Trump will 100% actually make it to his Jan. swear-in ceremony because the Liberals in power just CANNOT allow him back into the White House to tear their corrupt playhouse down.

They WILL attempt to take him out again after he wins the election. Lets hope he makes it thru all the hate and lies. But if the savior of our country somehow continues to escape and defy, imagine the beautiful images on The View and MSNBC as they all down their cyanide capsules in glorious harmony, unable to cope with true decency being back in the Oval Office!

Yes libtards--fire up those pussified EV's, tighten up those old buttcheeks to hold those throbbing/bulging hemorrhoids in, and head on up to Canada for some safe-space blues.

It's gonna be F-U-N!!

[redietz]

LOL. Singer has done some decent writing in his life, but he may have topped himself in the paragraphs above.

I think Singer's a little too enthusiastic, but I'm the guy who listened to a Trump biography on tape while leisurely driving to the opening of the Taj Mahal back in whenever the hell it was (1990; I had to look it up). My compadre was the late Johny Mucha, who was a Trumpster fan. We rented a vehicle for the excursion, as damages were always a concern since we traveled a la Hunter Thompson (never stay in the same place more than two nights because one never knows who is following you).

Anyway, we were well aware of Trump's many foibles before the trip (such as his old man transferring money -- technically avoiding inheritance taxes -- into Don's name and things like the Trumpster calling in "anonymously" while discussing his own dating life on radio shows). My current better half was also privy to a call Trump made when trying to get a loan for a casino in LV. Very entertaining. Not exactly presidential, but what after all is "presidential?"

It is really quite a caveat against the current incarnation of the Dems that I, a dedicated socialist, strongly believe that the Trumpster is the only sane choice in a few weeks.

I will pay, as Singer said, to watch MSNBC on election night. I already have a few bucks on Mr. Trump, so the question is when and if I hedge.

On a serious note, it is really something that my intellectual position is that what has occurred recently vis-a-vis media and censorship and control is so insidious and far-reaching that my vote will go to Trump. But what I see from the "left" is worse than anything Orwell cooked up, and it'll just get worse, given the current trajectory.

[accountinquestion]

.....and lose your ass. (Tasha, take note)

Not sure why asshats like Mark Cuban, Joy Reid, and Howard Stern don't get it yet, but they're in for a world of hurt in less than 2 weeks. I'm not saying that Trump will 100% actually make it to his Jan. swear-in ceremony because the Liberals in power just CANNOT allow him back into the White House to tear their corrupt playhouse down.

They WILL attempt to take him out again after he wins the election. Lets hope he makes it thru all the hate and lies. But if the savior of our country somehow continues to escape and defy, imagine the beautiful images on The View and MSNBC as they all down their cyanide capsules in glorious harmony, unable to cope with true decency being back in the Oval Office!

Yes libtards--fire up those pussified EV's, tighten up those old buttcheeks to hold those throbbing/bulging hemorrhoids in, and head on up to Canada for some safe-space blues.

It's gonna be F-U-N!!

I didn't realize this is your stupid.

These clowns were all TDS TDS then after all the shit that has happened, no one would be motivated to take Trump out on their own. Never has there been a President so devisive.

[redietz]

Just because somebody wears a nametag that says "divisive" doesn't mean, objectively, that that person is the "most divisive." Maybe "most unapologetically divisive" would work, or maybe "called 'most divisive'" would be true, but superficial respectful words (aka "Singing Kumbaya") are no measure of divisive effects.

Hard to imagine anyone more "divisive" policy-wise than Lyndon Johnson. Hard to imagine anyone with more flashpoint "divisiveness" than Nixon. Carter created massive divisiveness while serving as a perfect example of textbook morals, honesty, and Christian values, which led to his landslide loss in the first election since 1932 in which an incumbent was beaten.

I think the labeling of Trump as "divisive" serves as little purpose as criticizing Jerry Springer for being "divisive" on his show. The divisions aren't about Trump or Springer. Those guys are just making a career out of riding the wave better than anybody else.

[MisterV]

Was any president more divisiive than Abraham Lincoln?

And yet..."Honest Abe" has gone down as arguably the "best" president in history.

As for Trump and Kamala: Neither is acceptable to me: l voted Libertarian.

[mcap]

LOL. Singer has done some decent writing in his life, but he may have topped himself in the paragraphs above.

I think Singer's a little too enthusiastic, but I'm the guy who listened to a Trump biography on tape while leisurely driving to the opening of the Taj Mahal back in whenever the hell it was (1990; I had to look it up). My compadre was the late Johny Mucha, who was a Trumpster fan. We rented a vehicle for the excursion, as damages were always a concern since we traveled a la Hunter Thompson (never stay in the same place more than two nights because one never knows who is following you).

Anyway, we were well aware of Trump's many foibles before the trip (such as his old man transferring money -- technically avoiding inheritance taxes -- into Don's name and things like the Trumpster calling in "anonymously" while discussing his own dating life on radio shows). My current better half was also privy to a call Trump made when trying to get a loan for a casino in LV. Very entertaining. Not exactly presidential, but what after all is "presidential?"

sorry Red,

most of that shit never happened

[The Boz]

Was any president more divisiive than Abraham Lincoln?

And yet..."Honest Abe" has gone down

And now Abe is being remembered for sucking cock. Sad what happened to his legacy, but hey, he made the choice to take it in the mouth and hoo hoo.

[Rob.Singer]

Red, I was also at the Taj Grand Opening, but it wasn't because of gambling or because I wanted to see & praise our future 45th & 47th president. I was at a conference in town.

I'm confident because there's no way more than half of US voters want to continue on with this middle and lower class-killing economy. Kamala said it starkly last week when asked what she would do differently than what the administration is and has been doing. Her reply "nothing comes to mind" told all Americans to expect high grocery, energy, renting, and home buying prices to continue to stay super high, which while inconsequential to people like us, wreck many others' lives.

You don't win elections with that kind of stupidity.

Get ready.....

[MisterV]

And now Abe is being remembered for sucking cock. Sad what happened to his legacy, but hey, he made the choice to take it in the mouth and hoo hoo.

That would explain where the expression "Lincoln log" got started.

Hey...were Abe really gay wouldn't he have wanted the South to rise again?

[DGenBen]

Actually if you look at all the evidence, James Buchanan was the most likely ex president to be gay.

Never married and lived with another non married man for a large part of his adult life.

Much of the evidence for Abraham Lincoln being gay was sharing his bed with a man who came to visit him.

But in those days heterosexual men in rural areas would often share beds as houses were small & there weren’t usually extra beds, guest rooms or couches.

Plus without central heating or space heaters it was even considered OK for men to spoon in those days, & even give each other a little tug.

[accountinquestion]

Just because somebody wears a nametag that says "divisive" doesn't mean, objectively, that that person is the "most divisive." Maybe "most unapologetically divisive" would work, or maybe "called 'most divisive'" would be true, but superficial respectful words (aka "Singing Kumbaya") are no measure of divisive effects.

Hard to imagine anyone more "divisive" policy-wise than Lyndon Johnson. Hard to imagine anyone with more flashpoint "divisiveness" than Nixon. Carter created massive divisiveness while serving as a perfect example of textbook morals, honesty, and Christian values, which led to his landslide loss in the first election since 1932 in which an incumbent was beaten.

I think the labeling of Trump as "divisive" serves as little purpose as criticizing Jerry Springer for being "divisive" on his show. The divisions aren't about Trump or Springer. Those guys are just making a career out of riding the wave better than anybody else.

It is true I should have prefaced my comment with not in my lifetime but I suspect if we could quantify it Trump would still be #1. I can give you a 100+ reasons why but I'm not a history guy to put it in context. Like I don't even know where to start .. it may not be policy based but ... if you haven't woke up and at least accepted the guy for what he is then there is nothing that can be explained to you at this point.

We live in some post-truth world.

[accountinquestion]

Was any president more divisiive than Abraham Lincoln?

And yet..."Honest Abe" has gone down

And now Abe is being remembered for sucking cock. Sad what happened to his legacy, but hey, he made the choice to take it in the mouth and hoo hoo.

Seriously? Is this a thing?

As to what is presidential or not - many many many look up to Trump. He's told thousands of lies by now publicly. This has noticeably changed the ethics of the people who worship him, IMO.