[QUOTE=redietz;191064]Mickey, it wasn't me winning all those times. It was The Riddler. Surely you can take solace in being upstaged by a supervillain as opposed to me.

SEEK PSYCHIATRIC HELP FOR YOUR RIDDLER FANTASIES.

And you're kind of missing the point. Since you read Mr. Walters' book so carefully, let me know on what pages he says he did any programming himself. I'll wait.

WHILE WRITING ABOUT MICHAEL KENT, WALTERS SAID HE BECAME PART OF THE GROUP AS THE MONEY MOVER. WALTERS HAS ALWAYS BEEN THE LOGISTICS GUY, NOT THE HANDICAPPER. YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE A HANDICAPPER TO USE COMPUTER NUMBERS. BUT I KNEW THAT YEARS BEFORE FROM KONIK'S BOOK ON WALTERS PUBLISHED IN 2006. THE "GOTCHA" BULLSHIT AIN'T WORKING FOR YOU, DITZ. DID YOU READ KONIK'S BOOK?

See, if Mr. Walters didn't do any programming himself, but he won using computers, as you say, then why is there something wrong with me using programs but not doing the programming?

THERE WOULD BE NOTHING WRONG WITH YOU USING THE COMPUTER MODELS OF OTHERS. IT'S WHAT MUNCHKIN IS NOW DOING. BUT YOUR WHOLE SCHTICK IS YOUR PICKS ARE JUST OPINIONS. ARE YOU NOW SAYING YOU USE COMPUTER MODELS TO MAKE YOUR PICKS? YOU'VE DONE AN AWFUL LOT OF BASHING OF IT TO NOW MAKE THAT CLAIM.

You want to go on a podcast and not answer questions? Well, I don't blame you. If I were you, on a podcast with me, I wouldn't want to answer questions, either. I give you credit.

I'M NOT THE ONE CLAIMING TO BE A SPORTS GAMBLING EXPERT. YOU ARE THE ONE MAKING THAT CLAIM. ONLY THE SO CALLED "EXPERTS" SHOULD BE ANSWERING QUESTIONS. SO WE CAN COMPARE THEIR ANSWERS TO THE ANSWERS OF OTHER "EXPERTS."

THERE ARE A HOST OF NOTED SPORTS BETTORS FOUND ON THE INTERNET AND AT PUBLIC EVENTS. THEIR ANSWERS APPEAR TO BE SOMEWHAT DIFFERENT THAN YOURS. THEY EMBRACE COMPUTER MODELS. YOU DON'T. AND THEY ALSO DON'T INSULT THE PEOPLE ASKING QUESTIONS. THAT'S A CHARACTER FLAW YOU NEED TO WORK ON.