Professional Sportsbetting

[redietz]

He basically lies about everything.

1) He starts off by making declarative statements regarding things he knows nothing about (like, how much I wager, how much people I work with wager -- those are obvious ones).

2) Then he flat out lies (like his betting dwarfs mine -- LOL -- mickey can give you my amount of wagering at Northbet based on their free play acquisition rates and how much free play I had), and that's one site.

3) He edits his responses in such a way that he doesn't address core issues. For example, I warned him about what he was doing at Oddsmaker (where, by the way, I've wagered close to a million, not that that's a lot, but it's not nothing) with the bonuses. He ignored me, then one of the kewlJ(s) came back asking for advice two years later because Oddsmaker didn't want to pay him. LOL. Big sur-prise. But the kewlJ(s) don't address how they, the grand expert "APs," fucked up, and how I told them they were fucking up. So kudos to the kewlJ(s) editing. They are smart and everybody else is dumb, unless you actually read.

4) His attempt to branch out into sports betting is understandable, as blackjack players have hit an LV wall. Unfortunately, the KewlJ(s) have no actual sports betting experience, so they are forced to jive talk regarding bonuses as their way of demonstrating some kind of expertise. Only the kewlJ(s) screw up with their bonusing attempts, mainly because they have no finesse and are transparent as glass, which of course leads a suspicious person (say, an MDawg) to wonder how this dude evades constant counting exposure. It is weird that someone who claims to be so slick in avoiding being ID'ed as an AP at blackjack tables could be so ham-handed at sports betting and not realize he's being obvious to the nth.

The KewlJ(s) have the markings of real con men, mainly because of the classic scam red flags (no details; everything is kewlJ-centric against a backdrop of nothing; there are no other verifiable people in his stories). They are The Shadow(s), doing things these days that are beyond the ken of blackjack Hall of Famers. They bob, they weave, they bullshit.

Never a verifiable anything. All fairy tale corroboration and lies.

And MDawg, please quote me on this. Thanks.

No, I can't give anyone the amount you wagered, or didn't wager, at Northbet. The formula for doing it is easy enough but you never gave any proof that you had any free play at all.

Without proof your word can't be trusted. You showed your propensity to deceive with the GWAE fiasco. You met with Munchkin right after we suggested you do a podcast. Then, for months you led us to believe you would be making an appearance. Kept saying you would be making the appearance shortly. But after several months with no action, just words by you that you would appear, I contacted Munchkin to see what the hold up was all about. He told me you turned him down flat for doing a podcast at that meeting you had with him several months before.

You casually lied to us for several months. It calls into question every claim you've ever made.

That's all bullshit from you, mickey, and you know it. You are the one who has bullshitted everybody.

Go ahead and pull up the QUOTES where I said I'd be appearing on the podcast. Not that I was amenable to it, but that I had spoken with Munchkin and would be appearing on it. There are none.

The bullshit comes from your end, with you saying Munchkin wanted me on. The fact is that Dancer has qualms about allowing anybody who rolls his eyes at the ubiquitous use of the "AP" label on the podcast, so I assume that's why he's reticent to have me on. In fact, the last lunch I had with Munchkin, I said I'd be willing to be on pretty much any time, and he said he'd get back to me.

Now before mickey goes off and says, "Well, that proves you have no credentials -- LOL," which is what he'll say, let me add that....

No, you know what, let mickey have his say. Then I'll respond.

Mickey, you have devolved into a Grade A bullshitter. Munchkin never told you he'd definitely have me on, obviously, so what is your trick here? Tell me he'll have me on, he decides that's not a good idea, and then you claim I don't pass muster? I pass muster, my friend, but alienating half his audience is probably what Dancer is concerned about if I don't play nice.

It's disturbing that you flat-out lie about this stuff.

Anybody who has any questions about any of this should just email Munchkin. Easy Peasie. I assume his email is available via the LVA, so I won't give it out here. That's all I'll say for now. Email Munchkin directly and ask him (1) if I had lunches with him, (2) was I amenable to going on the show, and (3) did I pass any kind of fact check or reputation check? Instead of reading mickey's bullshit, just go to the source.

Mickey, I understand you probably have some dementia issues, and that's why I've been relatively respectful. I'm sure people have noticed that I've held my tongue with you quite a bit lately. I have even said some nice things. I have experience with people with the onset of dementia. They get facts wrong; they get nasty. Their personalities change. But, as with my father, they can sometimes do simple math as well as they ever could. I'm not going to sit here and engage in some back-and-forth and berate somebody who I think has dementia. I didn't argue with my father; I won't argue with you. That's respect.

So you have a good life.

Anybody who wants the reality of this nonsense should just contact Munchkin. That's easy enough.