Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
Since casinos can exclude people for any reason, subject to a few exceptions which don't apply to card counters, I see no way to fight it so long as they properly give you notice before the expiration of the two year period.

My analysis would differ were the casinos required to show a "new" offense but that seems not to be the case.
You are or were an attorney MrV and I am not, so I am not challenging your opinion. But prior to this revision where a period of 24 months was inserted, a trespass was assumed to be permanent, except in the very rare instance of a casino overturning it. Even in instances where the casino changed ownership, I think the trespass remained valid.

So then why make this change to 24 months, if they can just extend it like renewing a library book.

I don't know if a renewal violates the law but it certainly violates the intention of the law. Sometimes these kind of loopholes need to be corrected. But I have no interest in being a part of that. I don't see any damages or anything like that, that could make it beneficial.

I only brought it up because at least in my eyes, it is another case of the casinos doing the wrong thing. In this industry, when given a choice they always do the wrong thing...the sleazy thing.....take the lower road.

Kind of like our President, who wants to force courts to tell him "you can't do this or that" when he knows damn well, he shouldn't be doing some of these things in the first place. It is like a 'get away with whatever you can, regardless of whether it is right or wrong' mentality.