Originally Posted by RobSinger
Originally Posted by RobSinger
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
MDawg Adventures carry on at: https://www.truepassage.com/forums/f.../46-IPlayVegas
Degenerate gambler. When we hear this term, we tend to think of lower end gamblers gambling away every last dollar to the point that it effects their life and relationships with friends and family negatively. But a degenerate gambler doesn't have to be some lower end player gambling away his last dollar. It can be higher limit players that can afford to gamble and lose. So here is the definition I use: Engages in excessive, compulsive, and harmful gambling behaviors.
Bets for the rush of action above all else and isn't capable of making mathematically sound bets.
Mdawg fits that definition to a tee. Baccarat, craps, roulette seem to be the game of choice for degenerate gamblers (I guess slots as well). Baccarat in particular seems to draw these players. On every forum you see baccarat players claiming they are winning long-term when they are not.
Here is the difference between advantage players that can and do win long-term and degenerate gamblers that only claim to. Advantage players can specifically point to something they are doing that gives them and advantage. Degenerate gamblers never can or do. It is always some goofy thing like "I am rainman" or some top secret thing that he can't talk about.
There is no secret sauce that can replace the math.
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
The problem isn't that it isn't fair. The problem is that it isn't real.
Dawgs claims are on the same level as Rob Singer claiming he won using a progressive betting system (that was before he stole the DU bug claim). Or on the same level as EvenBob/Spike's roulette claims. Or even the guy Soxfan's Baccarat claims. Or some of the Youtube guys like mikki Maze.
Absolutely nothing supported by math. Just long disproven voodoo concepts or some secret sauce that they can't talk about.
Last edited by kewlJ; 04-20-2025 at 10:42 AM.
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
MDawg Adventures carry on at: https://www.truepassage.com/forums/f.../46-IPlayVegas
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
I'm not advocating for MDawg with this comment, but what I've learned about kewlJ is that (1) he ignores anything you tell him that he doesn't want to remember or that doesn't make whatever case he's arguing and (2) he argues things that he knows amazingly little about. Like the line about why anyone would be a handicapper as opposed to a pure gambler. His take on this, considering that I've explained bits and pieces to him previously, is either dishonest or incredibly naive for someone who's allegedly (and I emphasize the "alleged" in allegedly) been playing blackjack professionally in Las Vegas for a decade plus. He's either dumb as a rock or completely disingenuous. Or both, I guess.
I suspect disingenuous, if I had a gun to my head to choose. Which means the dude(s) is/are dishonest.
I'll be more than happy to lay out the many and obvious reasons someone would be a public handicapper versus purely a solo sports gambler, but not on this forum. On the PFA broadcast, sure. Basically, if you can't figure out two or three reasons, God help you in everyday life, much less the business world or the world of sports gambling. But I'm willing to play Dragnet and lay it all out succinctly.
Over and out. And MDawg, feel free to quote me on this. I'm sure the kewlJ(s) will have a dozen responsive posts, but basically they'll all be bullshit. I'll be more than happy to disembowel what passes for KewJ(s) "logic" live.
I asked Mdawg a very simple question that he can't and won't answer. Now I am going to do the same with you Red.
You claim to be a professional sports bettor, who has made a living in the sports betting arena (which includes contests). I don't know whether you are or not. (please don't send me documentation from 1983).
But my simple question is why does a successful sports bettor, capable of picking winners at a rate enough to win (overcome vig), need investors and clients? Why not just pick winners? What do you need "clients" for?
Just like with Dawg, I won't hold my breath waiting for an answer.
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
MDawg Adventures carry on at: https://www.truepassage.com/forums/f.../46-IPlayVegas
Why isn't this retard making up more fake baccarat sessions?
I looked back in the thread and found where you wrote that you had questions...
...but there was only this question...
Your "what if" hypothesis, that the losses would more than offset the wins, is not a fact, it's an assumption.
That makes your silly "what would that look like?" question rhetorical...it requires no answer.
Dave Chappelle was actually IN our suite at the Sphere for Dead and Company but strangely (or maybe not so strangely for a celebrity) he kept popping out to go not sure where. He actually stayed put in suite for only minutes at a time. I saw him pop into another neighboring suite too for a bit. He was very friendly shook hands with anyone who wanted and waved at fans from neighboring suites.
I wouldn’t have even recognized him I’m not so into celebrity watch but one of the girls with me grabbed me and said, that’s Dave Chappelle!
When we watched the Knights at T Mobile get pummeled Game 2 Stanley Cup playoffs next door to us was the owner of the Wild team. Someone in our suite was a Minnesota fan and recognized him shook hands with him over the edge suite to suite.
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
MDawg Adventures carry on at: https://www.truepassage.com/forums/f.../46-IPlayVegas
At the Sphere I assume they have a way to get celebrities out quietly because otherwise it is quite impacted trying to get out of there at the end. Or maybe they just have to leave early because there’s no way to avoid at least the other suite occupants who will all be exiting to those levels together at the end of the event.
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
MDawg Adventures carry on at: https://www.truepassage.com/forums/f.../46-IPlayVegas
What the fuck is wrong with you Dawg?! You are one insecure narcistic dude, always trying to impress people.
The last time you tried to impress us with tales involving hockey players, you claimed you were playing blackjack with members of the Montreal Canadians hockey team. Problem was the Canadians hockey teams was quarantined in Canada at the time.
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)