Big Casino Wins and Jackpots

[arcimede$]

Just under 6' at 200 lbs ... heading towards 190.

[Alan Mendelson]

I thought you might do something like that....and say something stupid like that too. Must be why you didn't look at the first $50k jackpot again to compare the two latest to what THAT symbol looks like (gee....now why is it that this one is also "right on the money") and why you don't go to the casino in LV like you said and take a picture there.

Rob... I guess it is YOU who has the reading comprehension problem. Look at what I wrote on Feb. 14 after you posted the latest $50K win:

I would just like to point out that the $25 symbol appears as the other did in the first controversial photo, with the denomination over what could be considered the "border line" of the graphic. Also note that this was at a different casino (a Caesars property) and so it appears that this new photo confirms that the previous $25 photo was not doctored.

All I did above in this morning's post (and try to let this sink into your arrogant mind) is to point out that Rincon does not have the new machines yet and that's what I said. I am still "open" to idea that the new graphics package on the new IGT machines will be what you are showing in the photos.

I am hoping to get to LV at the end of this month but right now I can't. However, you could go back to that casino on the Strip and take another photo of the same machine WITHOUT A JACKPOT SHOWING to show us what that graphic looks like -- and that would help to confirm your photo.

In the meantime, if anyone else has seen the new IGT machines with a $25 denomination (at Rincon the highest denom is $5 on the new machines) please take a photo and post here.

And Rob... read more carefully and take a moment to think about what you write before you blast someone who at least is trying to give you a chance.

[Alan Mendelson]

I'm five feet, 9 and a half inches. I will be five feet, 10 inches in April. I'm 183 pounds on a good day and recently went on a diet because I was tipping the scales at 202.

And regarding the age of forum members... if you include all my spare parts, my body's "blended age" is 22.

[vpguy]

Congrats Rob and thanks for the photos. Nice to see some big winners. Question for you: You lost the first session and hit on the next one did you also change machines after losing the first session or stay on the same one? You are on quite the winning streak keep it going.

[Rob.Singer]

Congrats Rob and thanks for the photos. Nice to see some big winners. Question for you: You lost the first session and hit on the next one did you also change machines after losing the first session or stay on the same one? You are on quite the winning streak keep it going.

Thanks! No I did not change machines even after losing the first session. I only change if I feel the machine is in a cold cycle, and it did not display what's necessary for me to switch.

Alan, if there's confusion about anything, it's a by-product of the nonsensical waste of time your crack team of paupers & haters--at times encouraged by you--spend in futile attempts to disprove reality. I understand they're hurting and they need a release any way they can get it. But instead of fanning the flames of their jealousy, just give them a dose of tough love and let them suffer thru this on their own. But as always, I'll be smiling thru it either way.

I have no plans to go to LV for a while. I also don't see the fascination with those symbols--they are what they are. No one actually believes I "produced" these big winners or that I even know or care to know how to do that, if it's even possible. What they can't deal with--and I include you in on this--is how many big wins I've had over a relatively short period of time, and by playing so few hands overall. The losers here cannot cope, the math people cannot compute, but those who don't allow envy to drive their emotions seem to accept that there's something going on here that we all hope for: a very, very lucky streak. Just remember, this is just one more example of why pay tables and expectation mean next to nothing in winning consistently at vp. It's the person and not the machine that is the only true vehicle.

[a2a3dseddie]

Thanks! No I did not change machines even after losing the first session. I only change if I feel the machine is in a cold cycle, and it did not display what's necessary for me to switch.

Alan, if there's confusion about anything, it's a by-product of the nonsensical waste of time your crack team of paupers & haters--at times encouraged by you--spend in futile attempts to disprove reality. I understand they're hurting and they need a release any way they can get it. But instead of fanning the flames of their jealousy, just give them a dose of tough love and let them suffer thru this on their own. But as always, I'll be smiling thru it either way.

Ha! Why would anyone be envious of a convicted pedophile? A tax cheat? A friendless trailer park bum? A forum poster who hasn't produced a shred of proof of his omniscience?

You need some new material Rob. Why don't you come on here and claim you discovered a cure for cancer or better yet claim you have an endorsement deal to make dildos in the image of that schlong you also keep bragging about?

Any word on the data meeting? Win/loss statements? Tax forms? Unless you scaped up enough money for that sex change operation you've so pined for, you MIGHT still have a schlong but as your 2600+ posts show, you have absolutely no balls. Zinger!

Rob Singer (Pedophile) Rest of the Forum 50, 010

[slingshot]

Thanks! No I did not change machines even after losing the first session. I only change if I feel the machine is in a cold cycle, and it did not display what's necessary for me to switch.

Alan, if there's confusion about anything, it's a by-product of the nonsensical waste of time your crack team of paupers & haters--at times encouraged by you--spend in futile attempts to disprove reality. I understand they're hurting and they need a release any way they can get it. But instead of fanning the flames of their jealousy, just give them a dose of tough love and let them suffer thru this on their own. But as always, I'll be smiling thru it either way.

I have no plans to go to LV for a while. I also don't see the fascination with those symbols--they are what they are. No one actually believes I "produced" these big winners or that I even know or care to know how to do that, if it's even possible. What they can't deal with--and I include you in on this--is how many big wins I've had over a relatively short period of time, and by playing so few hands overall. The losers here cannot cope, the math people cannot compute, but those who don't allow envy to drive their emotions seem to accept that there's something going on here that we all hope for: a very, very lucky streak. Just remember, this is just one more example of why pay tables and expectation mean next to nothing in winning consistently at vp. It's the person and not the machine that is the only true vehicle.

OK. I think I'm starting to get the hang of it. So, the 1200 credits allow enough for 3 sessions,which can all be played on the same machine IF it shows no clear-cut signs of a cold cycle. And the determinants include sweeps and just holding 1-2 cards on certain hands that hold no real possibilities.

[a2a3dseddie]

No one actually believes I "produced" these big winners or that I even know or care to know how to do that, if it's even possible.

Hmmm...didn't you "doctor" that picture when you censored out the name of the casino on that $100,000 jackpot picture? You knew how to do that.

[redietz]

The symbols "are what they are." And Rob isn't going to LV for awhile.

That tells you what you need to know.

Sane folks may wonder why some of us bother poking at Rob's various claims to fame. Well, for me, it's something like this: USA Today, when it began publishing in 1982, had a full page, and sometimes two, covered with ads from sports services claiming to be 91-6 against the spread or 110-9 against the spread -- things like that. Now today, if we looked at two full pages of ads from various handicappers claiming to be able to do that, we'd just roll our eyes. But back then, before ESPN got rolling and everybody had a handle on sports gambling, many people believed the ads. Why, after all, would USA Today run them if they weren't true? The answer is because it made USA Today money -- at least until the complaints started flooding in. So I've been yacking about reality for the last 35 years or more.

If you can, go back and check out the first year of USA Today and take a look at those ads. It's scary what was considered "believable." Video poker today may be where sports gambling was back in 1982 -- some folks, maybe most, might believe Rob's claims. The photos, after all, are on this forum. What would they be doing here if they weren't true?

Rob's claims are in the same realm of probability as the USA Today ads, unless, of course, he's playing quite a bit or he's psychic and knows when the machines will hit. Now I'm not saying Rob's lying. I'm not even sure Rob's sane. I'm just trying to help those people who may think the 110-9 or 91-6 ATS records are achievable.

[a2a3dseddie]

Well put redietz. Add to the fact that he's belligerent and hostile towards anyone who would like to see ANY kind of proof and we have one insane carnival barker on our hands. As seen though on this forum (and as you suggested) there are a few people that actually believe whatever Kool-Aid he's serving up. I feel sorry for them, just as I feel sorry for all the children he's lured into his RV believing he really did have a cute puppy in there.

[a2a3dseddie]

Hey Rob, Maybe you could clear something up about your most recent win in New Orleans.

Alan, we're off in a few minutes. I'll leave it to you to round up these jealous clowns

This is what you said on Feb.12 at about 7:38am.

Well, because of my recent big win at another Harrahs property and just as I predicted, I received a slew of offers already. One of them was a free flight for two to Harrahs in New Orleans! We just returned and I couldn't WAIT to show everyone the good news (again)!

And this is what you posted on Feb.14 at about 1:44pm.

On a direct flight, isn't it about 4 hours from Lake Tahoe to New Orleans? So you got on a DIRECT flight from Lake Tahoe to New Orleans on a Wednesday morning and spent a whole day in New Orleans before flying back?

With time spent travelling to and from the airports, getting through security, checking or collecting luggage, travelling to and from the hotel/casino, eating and sleeping you probably did only have 10 minutes or so to hit that $50,000 jackpot on a similar video poker machine with the distorted $25 denomination symbol.

I guess that does support your statement that you are hitting winners with little to no play at all!

[redietz]

Yeah, not very likely. That's a bit far-fetched, even by Rob's standards. He needs an editor or proofreader or something.

But I don't blame him for claiming just 24 hours in New Orleans. That city has brothels, but no dens of envy.

[Alan Mendelson]

Why would anyone be envious of a convicted pedophile? A tax cheat?

I have to draw the line here. I don't know the origin of these pedophile and related comments but they have to stop. Same with the tax cheat comment. I don't know of any conviction for violating the tax laws.

These comments cross the line -- as do comments about being an addicted gambler whether they are made towards Rob or me or anyone else, without proof.

[a2a3dseddie]

Sure thing Alan. I will stop. Will Rob?

[redietz]

Hey, if legalities are the issue of where to draw a line, I have a question. It seems to me that if Person A won a jackpot and paid taxes on it, then if Person B claims that same jackpot there may be legal issues. Paying taxes on a jackpot would be a contract indicating ownership of the jackpot, right?

[a2a3dseddie]

Whoever won those jackpots should have gotten a hold of Rob anyways. He never pays any taxes on any of his winnings. Could have saved themselves some money!

[Alan Mendelson]

Wow, did I have a night last night.

At about 9pm I decided to get in the car and go for a drive to my local In 'N Out for a double double and a chocolate shake. I ordered it "to go" meaning the burger should have been bagged, but they gave it to me in the open carton with a lap mat to enjoy in the car. But this In 'N Out did not have a parking lot -- it's a drive thru only -- so I was "forced" to drive. And I could only make a right turn out of the In 'N Out which took me to the freeway on ramp.

The delicious burger must have clouded my judgment because the next thing I knew I was in the garage at Rincon.

Over my last several visits there I accumulated small wins which totaled up to about $3K so I didn't think twice about taking out $1,000 to play. And my first hand pay was quad aces on $5 Aces and Faces (photo below). Then I went to play card craps where I lost $500 in short order. I wanted to preserve some of my win from the quad aces so I played $2 Aces and Faces and ... I hit my first royal of 2014. I was actually dealt a flush with the 4 of diamonds, which I dropped and miraculously the Jack appeared. This was my first royal since October of last year. (Photo below.)

I "locked up" the $8,000 from the royal so I couldnt touch it and I still had a few hundred bucks and went to my favorite $5 Aces and Faces machine... the same one that gave me the quad Aces earlier. I drew a straight flush... which just as easily could have been a royal since the three cards I held were royal cards. (Photo below.)

And then, a little later, quad aces again and I held only one ace. I played one more hand and cashed out the remaining credits. But the morning wasn't over (it was now about 9:30am) because there was free play to pick up -- $150, plus a surprise bonus of $60. So I went back to the same machine that I hit the royal on but this time played Royal Aces Bonus Poker (which the night before dealt me quad aces for $1,000 at 25-cents per coin.)

Royal Aces is a tough game. I was playing at the $1 denomination and went through all of the free play and then on the very last 5 credits I was dealt a pair of threes, and drew the quad 3s for a $400 win. I left the quad 3s showing on the machine and headed to the garage.

[Vegas_lover]

Great wins Alan. Here's the difference between you and Rob: I believe you when you talk about your wins. Why? Because you also share the stories about your losses and you often show how many hours it took you to eventually end up with more money in your pocket than you came with. Reminds me of a Vegas trip we made last year. We were playing slots for a couple of hours at 1,50 dollars a spin, had a number of cocktails and had a very good time except for the fact we were losing. We lost about $600 in 3 hours. We than walked over to a Wheel of Fortune (dollars) machine. I put 20 dollars into the machine and get to spin the wheel on my 4th spin and hit $500. My wife puts 20 dollars in the machine next to me and on her first spin she gets the "bonus". She spins the wheel and ends up winning 400 dollars. It took us 3 hours to lose 600 and about 5 minutes after that to win 900.

2 days later, after a couple of hours of shopping we stopped at NYNY and played the Wheel of Fortune (quarters) machines. There's a row of at least 10 of those machines in the middle of the casino, close to the center bar. There was only one available. The people playing at all the other machines weren't really winning a lot. They also didn't get many "bonus wheel spins". We sat down, put $40 in the one vacant machine, 2,5 hours later (and slightly drunk) we cashed out over $1000.

[Nash]

Congrats Alan. Did you get all of those on the old style Game Kings or the new ones?

[Count Room]

Terrific session, Alan! Nice draw on that royal, congrats. You're on a roll again.

It seems you're on a winning streak of $3k before this session plus the total you won on this session.

I've been on big streaks like that and whenever I lose back about 1/3rd of the total from the peak of a multi-week streak it's a cautionary sign to step back for me..

The 33% number I am using is a close approximation of a Fibonacci retracement (38/62%) that many speculative traders use...

Imagine your winning streak as a steep climb on a stock price chart and when you fall back down 1/3rd of the other side of the "mountain" from the very top of the streak's "peak" it's a good time for me to stop and smell the coffee. For some reason I've seen this happen over & over...