Darryl's Background Story! :D

[MisterV]

*I like watching smart guys talk about science and physics. makes me realize I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer*

[MHF]

Ha. Already explained that stuff, by the natural inversions of the electromagnetic, and gravitational, fields; incidentally which correlate to the various lengths of the periodic, and other, thus tables, as calculated by both of the direct, and, then, indirect, means. The old 2*p^2 model, for the earlier terms, holds quite nicely then. You guys. More likely a "grag" force, analogous to the electro-magnetic, than dark energy/matter.

So what you are saying is the periodic table’s structure correlates naturally with field behavior, not coincidentally, but because of deeper field-based inversions or symmetry principles?

And you are looking for unification through field symmetry and structure

I think that the chemical elements will become easier to synthesize, beyond some point, say, an initial significant "island of stability", but, still have to be synthesized.

AI Overview

Island of Stability - Discovering Superheavy Elements

The "island of stability" in nuclear physics refers to a theoretical region of superheavy elements that are predicted to have significantly longer half-lives than other known superheavy elements. Element 140, also known as unquadnilium, is a hypothetical element within the superactinide series and is a potential candidate for residing on this island. While element 140 itself isn't necessarily the "center" of the island, it could be part of the larger group of superheavy elements exhibiting enhanced stability due to "magic numbers" of protons and neutrons.

My method is like iterating matter and motion onto time and space until everybody is happy. Each iteration produces something different, except the final one, which was there, all along, as the mean or average of everything, in balance. Like going further out of the universe, only to end up where started as the way to manage infinitude.

"Matter to motion, in time for space", would be my slogan. Ha.

[DGenBen]

*I like watching smart guys talk about science and physics. makes me realize I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer*

Einstein developed a theory about space.

And, boy, it was about time, too

[MisterV]

Einstein developed a theory about space. And, boy, it was about time, too

[MHF]

Einstein developed a theory about space. And, boy, it was about time, too

Better hold off, on the cymbals. It was, and, still is, only a theory, as in the Theory of Relativity. The reason that old Einstein never finished it, primarily because the, his equations became totally insoluble. We still don't know that it's true, or not, or whatever.

You require the numerals to really, in theory, and, actually, in practice, prove something out. Ha.

[DGenBen]

Einstein developed a theory about space. And, boy, it was about time, too

Better hold off, on the cymbals. It was, and, still is, only a theory, as in the Theory of Relativity. The reason that old Einstein never finished it, primarily because the, his equations became totally insoluble. We still don't know that it's true, or not, or whatever.

You require the numerals to really, in theory, and, actually, in practice, prove something out. Ha.

Yes, Relativity is deeply successful, but not a complete theory of everything. It doesn't include quantum mechanics or explain dark matter, dark energy, or gravity at quantum scales.

Awhile back I introduced a new theory of inertia but it doesn’t seem to be gaining momentum.

[MisterV]

We watched a show on Amazon where it was posited that our universe is in fact contained within a black hole, which in turn is part of a different, parent universe.

Known as black hole cosmology or Schwarzschild cosmology, the theory proposes that the event horizon of a black hole could also be the boundary of our observable universe

Mind boggling.

[DGenBen]

We watched a show on Amazon where it was posited that our universe is in fact contained within a black hole, which in turn is part of a different, parent universe.

Known as black hole cosmology or Schwarzschild cosmology, the theory proposes that the event horizon of a black hole could also be the boundary of our observable universe

Mind boggling.

I think that same theory also states that all the black holes in our universe have separate universes in them.

Mind boggling in one way, but in another way no more mind boggling then if our entire universe existed inside of a Rolex that was jammed up into a Las Vegas hooker’s cooch.

And then for every Rolex that was jammed up into a hooker’s cooch in our universe, another universe would exist inside of there.

[MisterV]

A real mystery to me is "How could matter / energy/ the stuff or reality come into existence in the first place?"

Yes, I am aware of the Big Bang theory but it in turn begs the question.

Equally mind boggling, at least to me, is the concept of time / infinity: how could things have always existed?

[DGenBen]

A real mystery to me is "How could matter / energy/ the stuff or reality come into existence in the first place?"

Yes, I am away of the Big Bang theory but it in turn begs the question.

Equally mind boggling, at least to me, is the concept of time / infinity: how could things have always existed?

Both are pretty easily explainable. Matter / energy / stuff or reality can come into existence from nonexistence quite easily since in a state of nonexistence there are no physical laws to prevent things from coming into existence out of nothing, so things coming into existence out of nothing are internally consistent in a state of nonexistence.

How could things have always existed? There are only two possible states: existence or nonexistence. So for all of eternity either existence or nonexistence has occurred regardless of time. Since it’s already shown above how existence can arise from nonexistence then one state or the other having always existed is reasonable.

[MisterV]

I've read a bit about this and to me it seems a bit of a reach: I mean, really?

POOF, something from nothing because there are no laws to prevent it?

How could chaos result in order?

[MHF]

As Einstein noted, cold is merely the removal of heat, ie, non-existence is merely nothing, not, some unexplainable quantity.

[DGenBen]

I've read a bit about this and to me it seems a bit of a reach: I mean, really?

POOF, something from nothing because there are no laws to prevent it?

How could chaos result in order?

It seems you are arguing that it is not reasonable to ascribe a property of something from nothing because there are no laws to prevent it.

But if that were correct then you would be committing the same error by ascribing a property to nothing of not being able to produce something, not because there are no laws to prevent it, but because there must be a law that would cause it, and yet nothing by definition would not have any laws!

[MisterV]

I am trying to focus on the physical causation, the creation of "something," whether it be from "nothing" or from some other yet to be defined source.

Existence may ultimately be defined as being "absurd," whatever, I am off to Chinook Winds to gamble, i.e. to revel in the absurd.

[DGenBen]

I am trying to focus on the physical causation, the creation of "something," whether it be from "nothing" or from some other yet to be defined source.

Existence may ultimately be defined as being "absurd," whatever, I am off to Chinook Winds to gamble, i.e. to revel in the absurd.

Good luck!

Remember that reality may be ultimately shaped by consciousness so if you really believe you are going to win, the universe may manifest it that way and make it so

[MHF]

I am trying to focus on the physical causation, the creation of "something," whether it be from "nothing" or from some other yet to be defined source.

Existence may ultimately be defined as being "absurd," whatever, I am off to Chinook Winds to gamble, i.e. to revel in the absurd.

Good luck!

Remember that reality may be ultimately shaped by consciousness so if you really believe you are going to win, the universe may manifest it that way and make it so.

I waited for the appropriate spot to insert "It" into the following, because of the lower-case m.

*I like watching smart guys talk about science and physics. It makes me realize I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer*

--->

List of churches that are Registered Historic Places in the United States. [First spot.]

Where There's Smoke (Superman: The Animated Series episode). [Last spot, #614.]

https://anagram-solver.net/I%20like%...r?partial=true


I like to think that the Universal Anagram Solver is more of a sum-over-histories calculator, in that time doesn't go ahead until its solutions can make sense. As with Pinball's vanishing 777-post, and, V's above as if to scream out for the "It". Can't say the number of times that there was no solution, but, then, the poster went back to edit something, and, voila, the solutions worked.

Not that long ago, at https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...l=1#post165985 , old, defunct-user Tablepooey suggested that the solver must have something to do with backward causation.

Interestingly,

614
= [(3^5 + 2^5 + 2^5) + (3^5 + 2^5 + 2^5)]
= {[0^0 + 0.5^-(0^0)]^5 + 0.5^-5 + 0.5^-5} + {[0^0 + 0.5^-(0^0)]^5 + 0.5^-5 + 0.5^-5}
---> 0555_0555 in each of the bases, and, exponents.



So, I guess, unless V gets three flaming churches, on a slot machine, he's not going to be happy with his evening out. Ha.


MHF MHF is online now
Gold
MHF's AvatarJoin Date
Mar 2024
Posts
214

[MHF]

Interestingly,

614
= [(3^5 + 2^5 + 2^5) + (3^5 + 2^5 + 2^5)]
= {[0^0 + 0.5^-(0^0)]^5 + 0.5^-5 + 0.5^-5} + {[0^0 + 0.5^-(0^0)]^5 + 0.5^-5 + 0.5^-5}
---> 0555_0555 in each of the bases, and, exponents.

More interestingly,

614
= 2*307
---> 307_307,

which, too, comes with zeros.

So, there's that numeral 37, again. But what's its relation to 555?

37 = 555 / (5 + 5 + 5).

Gosh, I pulled the MHF avatar back out of the hat, at just the right time. Ha.

And, even more interestingly, sometimes 0^0 = 1, in the sense that 0 of itself can make 1, as in something out of nothing. But, if not, then when is 0^0 still 0?

Furthermore, how to get both plus, and minus, 1's out of 0? Is the zeroth root of 0 = +/- 1, as in something else out of nothing, but, which cancels back to nothing?

Is no order, disorder?

Reminds me of the claim that 2 / 0 = 2 because 2 divided no way is still 2. Or, is there only 1 way not to divide 2?

P.S. A link about the 0^0 = 1, or whatever, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_t...eir%20side.%22 .

For the zeroth root, there's https://math.stackexchange.com/quest...oth-root-exist .


MHF MHF is online now
Gold
MHF's AvatarJoin Date
Mar 2024
Posts
216 ----------> 216 = 6*6*6 ---> 666

And, 177 = 3*59 ---> 359 = (-11 + 370).