"Once the computer has all the statistics....it can answer questions....When Dallas plays Detroit this week who will win and by how much? The computer gives it's answer. For example, Dallas will win by 7. Now the bettor must check with bookmakers to see if there's a discrepancy between the computer's line and the bookmaker's line. The bigger the discrepancy the more he bets."Originally Posted by redietz
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmYou brought up the book, Gambling Wizards. Here's an excerpt. The Computer Group fed statistics from thousands of games into software to determine how to bet. No opinions involved.Originally Posted by redietz
Mickey, I'm going to assume you're not what you were, as my plumber said to me while looking at my old high school yearbook. You've gotta realize there are half a dozen things wrong with what you just wrote. God bless you and all that, but I just assumed you had more awareness, including regarding the use of language. Now what are the holes in what you just said that make it kind of silly?
If this is your argument, be my guest and call it in, but you've gotta have a better grasp of things than this, I mean just in general. I'm starting to see you as a very narrow Dustin Hoffman type rain man than a savvy dude. If you seriously think you just made a case for something or other, you are wrong, and actually I'd appreciate it if you make this exact argument this way. I'm not yanking your chain. I think it provides an entrance point for civilians to understand what I'll say.
It may, however, come across as if you are a little bit lost in space. I just thought of something. LOL. Have kewlJ call it in. Hey, geezers gotta stick together. I got your back.
redietz, what part of the above statement do you no understand? We can help you with it if you want.
It's your stance on measuring EV that I was interested in. And I wanted to get it on GWAE before they went defunt because they had a wide pro sports bettor audience. Everyone in the gambling world listened to those podcasts. I wanted to see a debate among pro bettors as to the measuring of EV in sports betting. But you've stalled so long that two years have gone by and PFA Radio will not bring on debate about EV in the sports betting world.
I know what your opinion is on it, you've already explained it thoroughly. Nothing you can really add on a podcast. So I won't be calling in because I won't be listening. His shows run late night to early in the morning anyway. He archives the shows on PFA. Maybe sometime down the road, when I have a little time, I'll give it a listen.
I'll be taking my questions elsewhere, to Krack, Fezzik and a host of others. I already know where Walters stands, the computer model does the handicapping for him. It's obvious that you did but did everyone else in the Johnson City Book Club really ignore Walter's computer driven handicapping system? If that's the case then what the hell did you guys talk about, the weather?
Reply With Quote