Big Casino Wins and Jackpots

[Alan Mendelson]

Like at poker tables, I think we should have "English only."

[Vegas_lover]

Like at poker tables, I think we should have "English only."

Then make sure that your forum members keep their big mouths shut to foreigners for not speaking English perfectly.

[Alan Mendelson]

Then make sure that your forum members keep their big mouths shut to foreigners for not speaking English perfectly.

The Americans here don't even know proper grammar of their own language.

[Vegas_lover]

The Americans here don't even know proper grammar of their own language.

I know Alan and I see your point but that doesn't change my position on this matter. Sorry.

[slingshot]

So what does this mean in terms of you following Rob's strategy?

You probably don't remember any of the posts on hot/cold cycles or the posts where Rob spotted a hot cycle and went up in denoms to hit the impending quads or whatever win.

[Alan Mendelson]

You probably don't remember any of the posts on hot/cold cycles or the posts where Rob spotted a hot cycle and went up in denoms to hit the impending quads or whatever win.

I do remember Rob's comments about hot and cold cycles, but I am referring to this strategy of his that says to return to a lower denomination. As you noted in your previous post, had you not returned to a lower denomination your next quad 9s would have paid more. You wrote:

I went back to nickels, 4 9's hit and instead of a $100, I had now only $78. i should have trusted my gut instinct.

So again my question, what does this mean in terms of you following Rob's strategy? What about your own gut instinct? And more importantly, what if Rob has you playing nickels when the machine decides to give you a royal and you could have been playing quarters instead?

[Rob.Singer]

I do remember Rob's comments about hot and cold cycles, but I am referring to this strategy of his that says to return to a lower denomination. As you noted in your previous post, had you not returned to a lower denomination your next quad 9s would have paid more. You wrote:



So again my question, what does this mean in terms of you following Rob's strategy? What about your own gut instinct? And more importantly, what if Rob has you playing nickels when the machine decides to give you a royal when you could have been playing quarters instead?

Alan, your last sentence is the essence of my strategies. You WANT to get a royal anytime, even at your lowest denomination, because the overall goal of my method is to get out of the casino with a minimum-or-better win goal ASAP. And what about hitting other big winners on the lowest denominations in strategies that don't allow you to reach a casino-leaving win goal? They are just as welcome, because as soft profits, they allow you to go DOWN in denomination to start again, this time needing LESS in order to leave the casino a winner.

Yes I know leaving casino ambience and all that wonderful action after just an hour or even less is not possible for the vast majority of vp players. But THAT'S where I have a tremendous edge. It's not in the long term math that I'm able to keep clobbering the casinos. It's in my ability to close my mind to everything they want and expect players to do, especially when after winning or losing. You saw the four Aces I was dealt on triple play yesterday. I wasn't at the casino more than 15 minutes after planning to stay our at least several hours before I went home. Almost every vp player in the world would have played on, and probability overwhelmingly says they would have lost some, all, or even more than they won. Why? BECAUSE THEY JUST CAN'T WALK AWAY FROM THE ADDICTIVE ACTION! You know that, and that's why there's so much animosity towards me when people read about how I've completely overcome that serious flaw/weakness since 1999. And therein lies the reason you and others resist learning how to do better.

[Rob.Singer]

I'm at the Wynn this weekend. The $25 symbol is 100% OFF centered.

Listen closely and become stupified by the sound of the pits falling in everyone's stomach....Now we'll have to endure the disappointed ones as they have no choice but to claim "amazing photoshopping skills " or "time travelling guru"or "we know he lost it all and more on the $100 machine, trying to be like Shirley Dancer". So much fun...

Is it any wonder all the envious & hateful critics skipped over this one? Well that won't happen now, as everyone--especially ARCI--can't let a post (or a picture....) go by written/posted by me without taking it in deeply. Even if it hurts

[Alan Mendelson]

Alan, your last sentence is the essence of my strategies. You WANT to get a royal anytime, even at your lowest denomination,

Sorry, this makes no sense. If you have a $73,000 bankroll (or whatever you have Rob) why would you want to piss away your good luck at 25-cent machines or even dollar machines when you could be playing $5 and higher and getting your good luck fulfilled with a bigger denomination win?

When I was playing quarters at the Vegas airport last night it was because that's all I could budget for this casino visit... $60. And then it was off to Nathan's for a hot dog before my flight.

And did I wish I was playing dollars instead of quarters after the hit? You betcha I was.

[Nash]

Alan, if you like hot dogs next time you're on your way to Rincon stop at Portillos in Buena Park (down the street from Knott's in the front of the Buena Park mall) for a true Chicago hot dog or Italian Beef. You won't be going back to Nathan's.
Having lived in Chicago for 4 years I was so happy when they built the Buena Park and Moreno Valley locations.

[Rob.Singer]

Sorry, this makes no sense. If you have a $73,000 bankroll (or whatever you have Rob) why would you want to piss away your good luck at 25-cent machines or even dollar machines when you could be playing $5 and higher and getting your good luck fulfilled with a bigger denomination win?

When I was playing quarters at the Vegas airport last night it was because that's all I could budget for this casino visit... $60. And then it was off to Nathan's for a hot dog before my flight.

And did I wish I was playing dollars instead of quarters after the hit? You betcha I was.

It makes no sense to you because you have a block up instead of really trying to understand it. You're always thinking in terms of wishing you were playing higher denominations when you hit jackpots. Who doesn't. Where you're confused is in how it's the MINIMUM win goal that's important, and not how much over it you are in order to get up and leave, which again is the #1 priority in my strategy. Ignore all your wishes and dreams and stick to reality. Those huge winners will come, and they will come without having lost tons at the same high denomination before it does--which is the reason for using a large bankroll that you can't comprehend.

I don't like hot dogs.

[Alan Mendelson]

it's the MINIMUM win goal that's important,

But Rob, it's easier to hit your minimum win goal playing $25 8/5 Bonus poker... just one full house pays $1,000.

In fact, why aren't you playing $100 Jacks or Better? Hit two pair on the first play and you've got a $500 profit. Why are you wasting your time playing $1 and $2 and $5?? Do you need to soak in that casino environment through all of those lower denominations?

Those huge winners will come, and they will come without having lost tons at the same high denomination before it does

Oh I see... all that time you spend at the lower denominations is meant to eliminate the losing hands, and then when you finally do move up to the high denominations the machine is ready to spit out that winner. It's amazing how you have the machines all psyched out!

[dannyj]

Nice triple play hit Rob. And a very nice royal flush hit as well Alan, even though it was "only" on quarters. I am still looking for my first royal at a higher than .25 denom. Maybe tonight.

[Rob.Singer]

Nice triple play hit Rob. And a very nice royal flush hit as well Alan, even though it was "only" on quarters. I am still looking for my first royal at a higher than .25 denom. Maybe tonight.

Thanks Danny and let's hope you do that tonight, or soon afterwards.

In the meantime, the deafening silence over the $25 logo claims has even made its way over to the little houses in Holland, where envy runs high and language is gobbledygook.

[Vegas_lover]

In the meantime, the deafening silence over the $25 logo claims has even made its way over to the little houses in Holland, where envy runs high and language is gobbledygook.

Rob, as I said before ( but you never listen) I'm not interested in that logo. I don't believe any of your claims, right logo or not! There's nothing about you or your life I envy. I just feel sorry for you. Correction, I actually don't feel sorry for you, karma is a bitch and you'll get your fair share someday.

Coming back to your language BS, as soon as you can speak Dutch, we'll talk again. In the meantime, just put a sock in it because you simply ain't the brightest light bulb. Actually I think you're missing some functioning chromosomes. Drinking too much does that to an individual. Now, run back to your trailer park, fetch yourself a nice cold beer, bang some relative and enjoy Nascar.

[Alan Mendelson]

For the record I didn't doubt the legitimacy of the logo. But Rob still hasn't told us -- nor can we verify -- how much he actually played (winning or losing) before hitting the jackpot.

I could post the five $1 royals that my son hit in one day -- but we know the truth -- he still lost money on the day, so why bother?
And I could post photos of the five $5 quad aces I hit at Rincon in one session, but the truth is I lost money on that session despite five (5) W2Gs for $2.000 each... so why bother?

[Rob.Singer]

For the record I didn't doubt the legitimacy of the logo. But Rob still hasn't told us -- nor can we verify -- how much he actually played (winning or losing) before hitting the jackpot.

I could post the five $1 royals that my son hit in one day -- but we know the truth -- he still lost money on the day, so why bother?
And I could post photos of the five $5 quad aces I hit at Rincon in one session, but the truth is I lost money on that session despite five (5) W2Gs for $2.000 each... so why bother?

And this is where reading with comprehension comes into play, as you somehow never read my jackpot post which PRECISELY details how much I won--and played--overall. What it all comes down to is you not wanting to understand the strategy for some reason, which in turn completely obliterated your common sense and, unfortunately, your true desire to understand.

I do understand that you and your son are usually unable to quit when ahead, because you both crave action and just cannot stand to see it stop by going home. And I'm sure you both regret that problem and wish you could create reality out of the "fantasy" you pretend I live in with my ability to leave a winner so very often. I could teach you both how it's done, but it seems nearly hopeless just as it is for so many others, as most vp players just want that addictive intermittent satisfaction to come without taking any additional time to help that happen.

I will do the legwork shortly but all you need to do is look back when I posted my $100,000 hit and you will see the answers to your queries.
,

[Rob.Singer]

OK Alan, I explained very clearly that I took $10,000 to play a session of $1 thru $25 ARTT, that I had $500 left when I hit the $100k winner. So if you can add and subtract you'll see a profit of $90,500, and if you've ever read the VERY DETAILED explanation I wrote several times here about exactly how ARTT works, you would have understood all of it. But all you're interested in is how much I left ahead or behind. Well, you now have your answer twice, and no, I never play past my goal-attainment, which means the casinos never get my wins back. Never. That's what weak andinexperienced players do....all the time as you may know and be disgusted over.

[Alan Mendelson]

Rob, I said it couldn't be verified. That's number one. The detailing of your system about how many hands are played at each level (denomination) are nebulous at best. It could all be one big fish tale.

You won, congratulations. But you are tooting your own horn like John Phillip Sousa's Marching Band but no one is joining your parade.

And quite frankly, if you won with only $500 left on the meter you escaped disaster by the skin of your teeth. Some system that is.

[slingshot]

I do remember Rob's comments about hot and cold cycles, but I am referring to this strategy of his that says to return to a lower denomination. As you noted in your previous post, had you not returned to a lower denomination your next quad 9s would have paid more. You wrote:



So again my question, what does this mean in terms of you following Rob's strategy? What about your own gut instinct? And more importantly, what if Rob has you playing nickels when the machine decides to give you a royal and you could have been playing quarters instead?

I had hit 2 prs.(or better-can't remember) when I last progressed to quarters which sent me back to nickels. You would have to actually know the artt strategy to understand.