I'm just going to go Dragnet on you here. I've probably read 10 times the material on verbal and non-verbal presentation that you have. I've probably read 20 times the academic papers on the same topics. But does that make me an expert? No, it does not.
So what I recommend you do is survey Youtube (you know, with your usual two-minute commitment to "research") and pull up analyses of this widow's speech by professionals in the non-verbal and forensic interviewing fields. FBI guys and CIA guys and so on. Then listen to what they have to say. Some of it is very detailed.
And this is the issue I have with you, account. Once again, you presume you know something when you have no actual expertise, you have minimal training, and you have minimal exposure to what you are talking about. You do this repeatedly regarding every subject under the sun. You know sports gambling about as well as you know non-verbal forensics.
And this is also why people should post under their real names. So they don't get to play at having some kind of expertise when they have none. You are so far off base on this one that it's embarrassing. And yeah, nobody loves an uber-Christian beauty queen, but that doesn't mean she's faking who she is or what she feels.
You know, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that listening to non-verbal professionals analyzing a public speech might shed some light on it. The questions I have are (1) why spout about something without consulting what professionals have to say? and (2) what kind of thinking leads to the strategy of not investigating what professionals think?
This comes down to the basic "I'm Leonardo Da AP. I know it all."