I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
MDawg Adventures carry on at: https://www.truepassage.com/forums/f.../46-IPlayVegas
I always forget that Coach Belly claims to win at gambling with magical powers. His tedious obnoxiousness out shines that little aspect which he rarely brings up.
Although when examining the man behind the poster - it does sorta explain why he is so anti-AP. A different yet distinct type of nut we have.
Actually I suspect coach was just using a bit of satire to lampoon claims made by others...but he's so wry it's tough to tell some times.
What, Me Worry?
I may very well be wrong. I can't keep track of it all. If you don't claim to have some systems betting system with a casino game then I'm wrong. If you do - I have forgotten the details.
Regardless you're still a bitter old retard who gets off on making arguments that are pointless and not a fraction of the clever you seem to think.
And at least you got a response from me.
There are a number of people on this forum that I classify as anti-AP. Most you get a clear read on that they are/were long-time gambling losers that just don't like that there are players that play with an advantage and win. And coach belly may fall into this category as well.
BUT from the moment I first encountered Belly, I got a different read on him. It was that he is associated in some fashion with the casino industry, in New Jersey and as loyalty to that industry, he trashes and trolls players that actually win. If not him, then a family member or close friend is associated with the casino industry.
I have no proof. Just my initial read, and I have seen nothing that convinces me it was wrong.
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
A fraction is a quantifiable trait because it is a numerical value that represents a specific quantity.
Quantifiable traits are any characteristics that can be measured or counted and expressed in numerical form.
There are no established scientific or psychological metrics that can quantify cleverness with the precision needed to represent it in numerical form.
So your assertion above "a fraction of the clever you think" is not a rational concept.
Like almost all of your assertions and thoughts expressed on this platform, it's nonsense.
Last edited by coach belly; 09-28-2025 at 08:04 PM.
I approve of your thinking that I am "associated in some fashion with the casino industry" with "loyalty to that industry".
I'm adding that as a reference to my Linkedin profile.
Let me make sure I have your name spelled correctly...t...e...w...l...j
Rhymes with tool jay...that is to say you (jay) are a tool.
Is that correct?
Great interview of Krack. Turns out he's good friends with Billy Walters. Paid a compliment to Michael Bent, the computer guy who was Walter's handicapper. Admits he uses computer modeling. That tells me that Randy McKay does to because him and Krack are in cahoots. And I suspect that Munchkin's multi accounting is affiliated with this crew. The sports betting stuff starts about the 20 minute mark:
Druff, let us know when you receive redietz’ credit score.
A few interesting aspects.
https://www.dopaminemarkets.com/p/th...rts-betting-is
Yet another person who seems to know what they're talking about and uses EV and sharps. He doesn't use squares.
Some useful stuff to for promotion abusers who really kill it.
I wish some folks would consider the logic of someone who doesn't know what they're doing evaluating others who, in that person's opinion, "seem to know what they're doing" in service of arguing with someone who has demonstrated they know what they're doing.
But I digress.
In the interests of my eternally honest reporting, I was horribly incorrect (in the YouWager contest) with the SF/Rams game. I picked Rams 24-20, and SF won 26-23, so I was off by six points on the SF score and one point for the Rams.
Thus, after five games, I have been off by 15 total points for the final scores of all five Thursday games. Not sure what to make of that. I guess I need a title, "King of Thursday Night" or something.
Massive "sharp" money on Rams and the Under fell to earth like flaming asteroids. Rumor has it the craters were square.
I had to choose between teasing the Over or SF. I chose the Over because I know Mac Jones as a player from my XFL/UFL handicapping. I would have been better served with SF, but I'll take it.
Last edited by redietz; 10-03-2025 at 07:19 AM.
This retard just refuses to admit that he's wrong.
Dietz are you aware what the object of advantage play sports betting is? To make money! It isn't about coming close in some contest, where close doesn't pay anything.
For APs the "value" of any contest is that it costs nothing to enter and if you win is worth money. If you finish second or third it has no value. Now for a tout the value is just to finish fairly well and you can use that as a tool to attract new "clients".
EVERYTHING you do and say seems to be through the eyes of a tout and not an AP or winning player.
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
LOL. You are a joke. Obviously anybody betting the scores I selected made money. What kind of idiot are you?
An attention-seeking, brain-dead, self-absorbed moron idiot is the answer.
If you'll notice, I didn't announce which of those Thursday night games I had bet on. Why would I?
Answer: Because I'm not some attention-seeking, brain-dead, self-absorbed moron idiot.
And I'm being kind. Obviously if you are within 15 points on the total scores of five games, you are making some kind of money on them if you bet them. Some of us don't go around pointing out the obvious. We assume other people have a couple of working neurons.
But what was more unusual, more odds-against, more worthy of posting about? Making money on five NFL games, or nailing their scores to the wall like shooting bullseyes on a dartboard? I would say the latter, which is why I posted about it.
This kewlJ character can't be an advantage player. Unless he's betting a sawbuck a hand. He's just too damned stupid. Like, do you really think someone like Munchkin would read this stuff and come to the conclusion, "Redietz isn't making a dime on this because he's not reporting it?"
And MDawg, quote on this.
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
MDawg Adventures carry on at: https://www.truepassage.com/forums/f.../46-IPlayVegas
You can tell when you hit a nerve with this guy.That is when he gets nasty with all the name calling, just like all the other trolls.
I never said you weren't betting and making money. BUT long term, I will defer to Kim Lee's conclusion that you didn't and haven't made much money in sports betting. That maybe you broke even or make a few buck, at best. He studied the publications, knew what your records were.
And Dietz, do you really think tying yourself to Mdawg adds any credibility to anything you say? Good God man.
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
I think we are all growing pretty tired of your name dropping, when you know the person wont come here and dispute what you say or claim. It backfired with Kim Lee though.But you continue to do it with Billy Walters and Munchkin. And despite that mickey has been in contact with Munchkin who claims YOU pulled out of the interview.
How about you get Munchkin over here and lets ask him what he thinks. And we can ask him what he thinks of my blackjack claims. It has been a number of years since I communicated with munchkin, but I am confident he would believe my claims, because he KNOWS how it works. AND has had several professional blackjack players on who's claims are pretty similar.
The ONLY thing a bit unusual about my blackjack history is that I chose to play the majority of my play in one location. (Which happens to be the location with the highest proximity of games). To accomplish what I have done, you have to play a specific way, and I have shared just about all of how I do that. At least as much as I could without giving the store away. I am VERY confident Munchkin would conclude that I am telling the truth. Even not haven spoken to him in a while.
I look forward to you using your connection to get him over here. This place can use a shot of new AP blood.
OR you can just talk and name drop people you think won't come here to dispute you and hope it doesn't backfire like it did with Kim Lee.
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)