Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
That's what's called an incessant need to take theory to a more complicated, unnecessary level. The OP's question clearly eliminates one of the die from the calculation--random or not. Putting the other die back into the issue would lead to an F from any math professor at any university.
The original question does not give any clear information on one die - it does not say that this die is a 2. The original question only gives information on the pair of dice - at least one of them is a 2.