Originally Posted by OneHitWonder View Post
You brought the word paradox into this!
All I said was that the problem is referred as a paradox.

Originally Posted by OneHitWonder View Post
I asked you a couple of specific questions. No answer.
What were the couple of specific questions that you had asked in which I did not give an answer?

Originally Posted by OneHitWonder View Post
The reason Wikipedia isn't considered any sort of a scientific standard. Lol.
Did I say anything about Wikipedia?
I simply said to google the problem. Just look at the top searches—on the first page (top 9 results…and yes, one of them is Wikipedia but go ahead and ignore it if you wish). I’m seeing 7 of them with the word ‘paradox’ in the main tagline (despite leaving the word out of the search). So I was correct in saying ‘the problem is referred as a paradox’. But again, paradox or not, this has much to do about nothing.

Originally Posted by OneHitWonder View Post
I don't know in which branch of mathematics you believe you have any background, but arguing semantics is fundamental to all.
My background is strong enough to be able to answer this simple probability problem. For someone who just wants to argue semantics…you’re not being great at it.