Originally Posted by redietz View Post
LOL -- "matter of semantics." Lord almighty, now we have a dose of wizardry. You do realize "a matter of semantics" is like screwing up the order of signs in an equation and expecting to argue for the same values?

This is what I mean by language-blind. A bit obnoxious, a bit arrogant, and somehow correct even though you have no idea about the overall context of a piece of writing. Unbelievable.
Why all the ranting? A simple question, without semantics problems, was asked - you have an answer or not?

To be even more clearer - "matter of semantics." - I was referring to an eventuality that semantics might be the cause of misunderstanding even though I strongly doubt that and believe the question as written is JUST FINE especially after the ambiguity whether the outcome is announced ONLY after at least one two is present was cleared like years ago. I believe it is a mix of inability to read/think and ignorance in probability. Do I have to spoon feed every detail on top on my poor English?
Don't you people have at least a grain of shrewdness in you and are totally incapable/unwilling/trolling lovers to perceive a meaning unless it is spelled out letter by letter? Where are you in your life with such altitude? Are you even capable of any social life? Cause I don't believe you are if you need a Socrates like form in order to be able to perceive a bar chat like content.