Oh.....I didn't know you were actually serious. I thought it was some sort of joke. But no, facebook is not quantified, but it does show 1 graph (nothing else, at least that I can see) about facebook on that page.
Nothing shows up for WOV nor WOO. Little information about FB shows up. But yet, Alanbestbuys has all sorts of detailed information. So much for making it look unbiased (not that the website is unbiased, but, it is clear you "quantified" your website by signing up or doing whatever needs to be done). LOL.
Try these:
http://www.similarweb.com/website/alanbestbuys.com
15K Views
http://www.similarweb.com/website/wizardofvegas.com
95K Views
http://www.similarweb.com/website/wi...s.com#overview
440K Views
https://siteanalytics.compete.com/wi.../#.VrSBwcYrLnB
176K unique visits
https://siteanalytics.compete.com/wi.../#.VrSB8cYrLnB
34K unique visits
https://siteanalytics.compete.com/alanbestbuys.com/
"THIS SITE HAS RELATIVELY LOW TRAFFIC. WHILE COMPETE CAN PROVIDE VALUABLE INSIGHTS ABOUT SITES LIKE THESE, DATA FOR THIS DOMAIN IS CURRENTLY ONLY AVAILABLE TO COMPETE PRO MEMBERS."
It appears none of the 3 sites (WOO, WOV, ABB) have paid for their site to show data. (Look at the top right area, all 3 say same thing) --
https://www.semrush.com/info/wizardofvegas.com?db=us
https://www.semrush.com/info/wizardofodds.com?db=us
https://www.semrush.com/info/alanbestbuys.com?db=us
Comparing all 3 on one chart:
https://www.semrush.com/info/history...//us/Or//us/Or
Got the websites from here: http://www.incomediary.com/how-much-...c-website-gets
Reply With Quote