Originally Posted by arcimede$ View Post
They can. However, the probability is they will lose more often than they win and they will lose more than they win. That is what expected return means. The question is do you want to proceed with a high likelihood of losing or a high likelihood of winning. I think most smart people prefer to proceed when they have a good chance of winning. Isn't that why you play expert strategy most of the time?
Yes, that's why I do use correct, expert strategy 99.99% of the time. BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN ROB SINGER LOST. And that's my point.

You (meaning his critics who are self-proclaimed APs) cannot call him a loser because he plays negative expectation games. In fact, he has a history of winning that was documented in a weekly newspaper. And I know redietz says he respects the editorial process and I honestly doubt that the editors of GT would allow Rob Singer to openly lie in their newspaper.

There are a lot of critics here who say Rob is lying. Well, how about putting up some PROOF that he lied? And where he lives or lived or what he said about the storage locker with the remains of Jimmy Hoffa inside it, and the secrets about how the pyramids were built and the second gunman who killed JFK, or any of the other hullabaloo, has no bearing on his casino wins or the reports about them in GT.