I know nothing and am curious to see how this works.

For example, just because your (previous) attorney sends them a letter stating he's not representing you doesn't mean you do not have an attorney. Just because you write a letter saying you do not have an attorney, is that considered "proof" if it's not notarized or something? Interesting stuff.

Regnis? Anyone have any idea?

In a reasonable world, CET would take your letter and proclamation as good faith truth and proceed to reimburse you. They're going, however, to make you sign a waiver of liability, I'm assuming.

That's probably not a good thing to do in case your injuries result in a recurring infection or a resistance to the antibiotics used.

I say this, and I should have sued a few years back (but did not) when a "Doc in the Box" prescribed an antibiotic that could have killed me (and really messed me up). But I was just happy to be upright after the experience.

Anyway, good luck.