Caesars has a video of me walking thru the door. I asked for it and they declined to give it to me. My lawyer asked for it and they didn't give it to him either.

If we had the video it would show me entering the hotel with my phone in my left hand to my left ear and I opened the door with my right hand. The door is mounted on the right side so using my right hand to open the door would be normal. The video would show me walking thru the doorway and then it would show me coming to a stop several steps inside the doorway with me still talking on the phone. That's the moment I felt the "coldness" on my hand which was my hand covered in blood. The video would also show that my right hand was hit by the fast closing door.

If that's not what the video showed, why wouldn't Caesars or its insurance representative or Risk Management office say that, or provide the video?

Now you could make the argument that I should be aware of the door's closing speed. But I don't think I should have to be aware that the door had a fast closing speed. My normal expectation would be that a door would open wide and stay open so I could walk in -- and not that I would have to monitor the motion of the door and use my hands to keep the door from closing and hitting me.

I so much wanted to put the Caesars surveillance video online. They confirmed they have it, and they confirmed that they have the sequence of me walking in with the phone in my left hand.