Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
RS__ you have such a poor comprehension level when it comes to how to win at VP.
Actually, I've been doing fairly well playing VP and other advantage plays. By mere coincidence, my analysis of the games I play nearly mirror my actual results. With that said, I think my comprehension on how to win at VP and casino games in general is where it needs to be (although always room for improvement).

Originally Posted by Rob
You've been taught multiple times that the way I play the game has nothing to do with "showing evidence of how many times Rob's strategy will hit any particular hand (over time)." It has EVERYTHING to do with the fact that the bigger winning hands (aka, session-ending/goal-attaining winners) will likely have more of an opportunity to appear during the course of a single session.
Ah, why yes -- of course! Simply increasing the chance of a big winner is what makes you a winning player. Would it be too much to ask -- how much more likely?

Originally Posted by Rob
The reason "AP's" like you and arci and wizard and Dancer etc. have never been able to consistently win at the game, and continue to reject my success at it is simply because your group won't take the time and ask the questions that'll help get you to the proper level of understanding. Instead, you can only apply long term rules to short term play, thereby distorting the effort from start to finish....something expected of any critic who approaches any problem with a closed, one-track mind.
Huh? What do you mean we (APs) don't consistently win? I agree -- I don't win every session or anything like that. But my bankroll has had a pretty steady increase over time.