Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
Whatever the context, your statement was that a player is not guaranteed to lose, even if playing an -EV game. Do you want to retract that and assert that a player is guaranteed to lose? You have not, and apparently can not, define terms such as "short period", "few sessions", "very little" and "end up" with any precision, you toss these vague terms around like they mean something just to cover your poindexter ass. This was evident when you stumbled and fumbled by defining a "session" as an undefined period of time. So go ahead and explain what "end up" means...when does play end such that you can determine whether you have won or lost overall? Ultimately, only a few sessions played can be every session you ever play...isn't that correct? Likelihood is not a guarantee that the player will lose...you have already confirmed that.
Coach, you ask clear and concise questions. Very refreshing and you deserve an astute answer....

The probablity of video poker, as such, requires, nothwithstanding, the solution of the event, but under the assumption, and this is critically acclaimed, that the outcome, henceforth, has precise requirements, according to the evolution, , which goes unsaid, and furthermore, without due respect, of the said winning, remains steadfast in probability mechanics.

Coach, if you have any more questions regarding this very important topic please feel free to ask.