I have observed Rob's negotiations for challenges extensively in the past. His technique is to keep changing the terms and conditions until you get tired of trying to make the bet and go away. Then he will claim victory. And of course you seen what he did with arci when he got himself trapped in a bet he didn't really want to make. He welshed the bet . Rob has no honor. That's what you are dealing with, folks.
Do you remember Rob's "fifth card flip" nonsense? Rob had sworn that he had recorded over 100,000 hands of the fifth card flip and the thrown away fifth card came back the same rank 40% of the time. Shackleford and the Webmaster at videopoker.com both took him to task on this having Rob play a few hundred hands and recording the results. The results were about what they were supposed to be,6.4%. Rob, as always, chalked it up to not a big enough sample space.
At that time I was contacted by someone representing 4 individuals, one of them a casino owner in North Las Vegas, who wanted to make a challenge with Rob on the fifth card flip.Every time the card came back the same rank they would pay Rob $8000. Every time the card didn't come back the same rank Rob would pay them $1000. I told him I would let Rob know but I also told him what would happen. Rob would come with a bunch of terms and conditions. If they agreed to the terms Rob would add another stipulation . If they agreed with the extra stipulation Rob would come with another stipulation .If they agreed to that stipulation Rob would change the terms and conditions. Rob would keep running them around in a circle jerk until they got tired of trying to make the bet and went away. Then Rob would claim victory. They decided not to pursue the challenge.
Last edited by mickeycrimm; 02-09-2017 at 01:47 PM.
I just want to be sure 1-million hands are going to be played and how will this be verified?
Fat Belly, you wont be able to keep your nose out of Singer's ass long enough to go through with the bet.
Last edited by mickeycrimm; 02-09-2017 at 03:57 PM.
Can Alan hold our money in escrow...if he agrees?
What's the name of the joint in Butte?
I think I'll need a 100 play machine to get through a million hands in anything close to a reasonable amount of time.
Is it OK to play a 100 play machine? Will each deal count as 100 hands?
And..why are you getting nasty all of the sudden?
You APs seem sure do like to resort to name-calling when you get frustrated...you act like children.
That's so incredible, I had to look it up. During the summer of 2009, Rob met with two prominent video poker experts for live testing in actual casinos, first with the admin at videopoker.com, then later with the Wizard of Odds. Of course the results were within ordinary expectation, but look at the photo from Singer's meeting with Shackleford:
https://wizardofodds.com/blog/chat-with-rob-singer/
Rob is wearing a New England Patriots t-shirt!!!
Therefore Mickey, your argument is invalid.
Sorry.![]()
Blackhole is a parasite that doesn't contribute anything to the gambling forums.
Do you recall how many hours were required to play 5000 hands? A fast player can comfortably exceed 1000 hph on a modern game, but the old machines were typically not built for speed.
Probably a stupid question, but I'm not sure I understand the purpose of the flush 50 strategy. The obvious benefit is simplicity because I can use a single strategy throughout my play. But would it be "wrong" to vary my strategy? I would use flush 25 strategy during normal mode, and flush 125 during flush attack mode.
Wow. The Pioneer was commendably patient. Although it wasn't a simple task to change machines.
Of course, you make a valid point.
And there you have it...mickey crimm doing exactly what he has accused Rob Singer of doing.
Except we have direct quotes from crimm, and only hearsay about Singer...and that hearsay comes from crimm.
Last edited by coach belly; 02-09-2017 at 09:19 PM.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)