Trip Report: Lost the girl, won at craps

[redietz]

"types"



"Achilles heel"

And for someone who wrote about every excuse in the book for reasons why he "just decided to take off for Vegas in the middle of the night from LA" so many many times, and who now has a penchant for the very hi-limit video poker machines who also amazingly can't keep $100,000 jackpots in his pockets....we'll, let's just say my prediction wasn't very far off from being a direct hit.

"well"

How did you ever get away with such illiteracy?

As Gaming Today learned, you get what you pay for.

Hell, that wasn't fair. I liked many of Rob's columns at GT when he wasn't touting his non-logical junk. Gaming Today had good editors, so everybody got cleaned up a bit.

[jbjb]

"types"



"Achilles heel"



"well"

How did you ever get away with such illiteracy?

As Gaming Today learned, you get what you pay for.

Hell, that wasn't fair. I liked many of Rob's columns at GT when he wasn't touting his non-logical junk. Gaming Today had good editors, so everybody got cleaned up a bit.

Gaming Today was a trash publication. No facts in any of it.

[Rob.Singer]

It's stupid to waste time spell checking on a forum filled with morons. You get what you get with auto spell. The idea comes across loud & clear either way, esp. when you mock the fools.

I tingle when a point is made, then the people who get overly agitated by it (aka, my GOAL ) can't argue it in any way but instead, nervously claim my wife is ugly, my 1996 bankruptcy makes me poor today (yeah, ha!) and how I'm losing hair!!

I again win every which way.....Dem apples tasting good right about now?

[a2a3dseddie]

It's stupid to waste time spell checking on a forum filled with morons. You get what you get with auto spell. The idea comes across loud & clear either way, esp. when you mock the fools.

Come on JBJB you liked CEASARS when they had SUPERCRAPS across the border about 4 years ago!!..Last time I seen you at GREEKTOWN I'd say your around 40.

Yikes!

1. It's "cAesars"....not "cEasars".
2. It's "Last time I SAW you"....not "Last time I SEEN you".
3. It's "I'd say YOU'RE around 40"....not "I'd say YOUR around 40".

How did you ever get away with such illiteracy at WoV??

What's good for the goose...

[Rob.Singer]

What an idiot. "Ozzy" came on as a puny shaken anonymous poster who made every sentence look like one of you dildos coached him on it.

Not your best day eddie.

[redietz]

"types"



"Achilles heel"



"well"

As Gaming Today learned, you get what you pay for.

Hell, that wasn't fair. I liked many of Rob's columns at GT when he wasn't touting his non-logical junk. Gaming Today had good editors, so everybody got cleaned up a bit.

Gaming Today was a trash publication. No facts in any of it.

It's a tabloid for tourists. Nothing wrong with that, really, unless some poor blokes take the content hugely seriously. I like the Monti Rock column. I did find a couple of the sports inclusions interesting. They did a running tally of baseball team totals and ATS records. It was good to just take that in at a glance. They also have an annual ATS contest pitting the managers of all of the Las Vegas books against each other. That's pretty good filler.

Again, other than a weekly heads-up of promos at various casinos, it's of no real value to anyone who knows what they're doing, but why would it be? It doesn't exist so tourists can lose less money.

[Biloxi Bill]

It's stupid to waste time spell checking on a forum filled with morons. You get what you get with auto spell. The idea comes across loud & clear either way, esp. when you mock the fools.

I tingle when a point is made, then the people who get overly agitated by it (aka, my GOAL ) can't argue it in any way but instead, nervously claim my wife is ugly, my 1996 bankruptcy makes me poor today (yeah, ha!) and how I'm losing hair!!

I again win every which way.....Dem apples tasting good right about now?

Not a claim...she really is

[Ozzy]

What an idiot. "Ozzy" came on as a puny shaken anonymous poster who made every sentence look like one of you dildos coached him on it.

Not your best day eddie.

JERRY LOGAN has spoken folks !!

[Rob.Singer]

As Gaming Today learned, you get what you pay for.

Hell, that wasn't fair. I liked many of Rob's columns at GT when he wasn't touting his non-logical junk. Gaming Today had good editors, so everybody got cleaned up a bit.

Gaming Today was a trash publication. No facts in any of it.

It's a tabloid for tourists. Nothing wrong with that, really, unless some poor blokes take the content hugely seriously. I like the Monti Rock column. I did find a couple of the sports inclusions interesting. They did a running tally of baseball team totals and ATS records. It was good to just take that in at a glance. They also have an annual ATS contest pitting the managers of all of the Las Vegas books against each other. That's pretty good filler.

Again, other than a weekly heads-up of promos at various casinos, it's of no real value to anyone who knows what they're doing, but why would it be? It doesn't exist so tourists can lose less money.

I don't disagree that's what it is today. It's a shell of its former self, and after just one year of publishing my column it enjoyed it's most popular and prolific time ever--straight through until the day I quit sending in articles.

Today, the paper has not only shrunk in length & width--it's got less than half the # of pages. It's truly pathetic, but then again, I couldn't write my column forever, and Eileen D. didn't really think like her genius husband anyway. As a result, the GT of today is a joke. There were sponsors who bought ad space back then that would never even give it a thought without my Undeniable Truth column. And the reason it's a skeleton paper today is because the sponsors said bye-bye. Chuck knew how to run a successful paper. His wife does not.

[mickeycrimm]

Chuck knew that controversial bullshit sells. He played Rob like a fiddle. Attaboy! Rob! You tell 'em! The whole time he knew Rob was just another dumb ass. He laughed at Rob--and his readers--all the way to the bank. In his wildest imagination Chuck never believed any of Rob's bullshit about video poker.

The thing about it is....if you read one Singer article then you have read them all. There was nothing new in any of his articles, just the same old rehashed bullshit in every article.

[mickeycrimm]

deleted. duplicate post

[mickeycrimm]

Gaming Today did have one good section. The Gaming Business News. I kept up with it for casino openings and installations of games and gaming systems. For instance, I picked up a Gaming Today in the Vegas Club one morning. A little headline said Detroit Motor City Casino installs Lucky Coin Bonus System. I was in Detroit before sunset that day.

[redietz]

Gaming Today was a trash publication. No facts in any of it.

It's a tabloid for tourists. Nothing wrong with that, really, unless some poor blokes take the content hugely seriously. I like the Monti Rock column. I did find a couple of the sports inclusions interesting. They did a running tally of baseball team totals and ATS records. It was good to just take that in at a glance. They also have an annual ATS contest pitting the managers of all of the Las Vegas books against each other. That's pretty good filler.

Again, other than a weekly heads-up of promos at various casinos, it's of no real value to anyone who knows what they're doing, but why would it be? It doesn't exist so tourists can lose less money.

I don't disagree that's what it is today. It's a shell of its former self, and after just one year of publishing my column it enjoyed it's most popular and prolific time ever--straight through until the day I quit sending in articles.

Today, the paper has not only shrunk in length & width--it's got less than half the # of pages. It's truly pathetic, but then again, I couldn't write my column forever, and Eileen D. didn't really think like her genius husband anyway. As a result, the GT of today is a joke. There were sponsors who bought ad space back then that would never even give it a thought without my Undeniable Truth column. And the reason it's a skeleton paper today is because the sponsors said bye-bye. Chuck knew how to run a successful paper. His wife does not.

So Gaming Today downsizing had more to do with the lack of Rob's column than with the internet stressing a weekly tabloid as a news source. Interesting theory. It also had nothing to do with the Las Vegas economic crash of 10 years ago. It had to do with Rob's column.

Now here's something I don't quite understand. I don't see any difference between Gaming Today content today and 20 years ago. Rob, explain the vast differences in the paper under "genius" Chuck and "non-genius" Eileen. The only difference between the two is really the lack of your column, which leads us to the inevitable conclusion that not maintaining Rob's column clearly profiled Eileen as a "non-genius."

I will be sure to pass this forum posting onto Gaming Today, so they can appreciate their current folly. Maybe they will reward me with a free subscription.

Rob, one other question. That comment, "There were sponsors who bought ad space back then that would never even give it a thought without my Undeniable Truth column."

Would you care to name one still living? You know, one of them thar sponsors who would not advertise in GT without your column?

I find that quite a claim. Sounds almost narcissistic bordering on nuts. So could you name one? You said "sponsors" plural, so you must have some folks in mind. I know you wouldn't make that up off the top of your head.

Could we have a name? So, you know, we research types could verify the undeniable truth about it?


Thanks in advance.

Your friend,

Bob

P.S. If Rob doesn't provide a name, you know that I'll be dropping into the GT office to hand them this post and see if they know any sponsors who might have ceased advertising because of a "lack of Rob."

[blackhole]

Just passing through again, only to find the same exact drool being smeared page after page.

I know most of you guys are adults and seniors, yet, do you even have a fn clue of how fn foolish and pathetic each and every one of you sound?

No wonder gamblers and gambling get a bad reputation. Just listen to you fn morons carry on.

Really guys, maybe it’s time to think a little outside of the box. Get a grip.

[redietz]

Just passing through again, only to find the same exact drool being smeared page after page.

I know most of you guys are adults and seniors, yet, do you even have a fn clue of how fn foolish and pathetic each and every one of you sound?

No wonder gamblers and gambling get a bad reputation. Just listen to you fn morons carry on.

Really guys, maybe it’s time to think a little outside of the box. Get a grip.

Mr. Hole,

Have you considered the irony of an anonymous dude passing through to tell non-anonymous dudes that they're foolish and pathetic? If you're going to be a paternal force for good in the universe, at least put a name to your conceited moralizing. Then we'll all be on equal ground. I mean, if you're gonna hide behind a pseudonym while lambasting the foolish and pathetic, how scared and pathetic does that make you?

[Rob.Singer]

It's a tabloid for tourists. Nothing wrong with that, really, unless some poor blokes take the content hugely seriously. I like the Monti Rock column. I did find a couple of the sports inclusions interesting. They did a running tally of baseball team totals and ATS records. It was good to just take that in at a glance. They also have an annual ATS contest pitting the managers of all of the Las Vegas books against each other. That's pretty good filler.

Again, other than a weekly heads-up of promos at various casinos, it's of no real value to anyone who knows what they're doing, but why would it be? It doesn't exist so tourists can lose less money.

I don't disagree that's what it is today. It's a shell of its former self, and after just one year of publishing my column it enjoyed it's most popular and prolific time ever--straight through until the day I quit sending in articles.

Today, the paper has not only shrunk in length & width--it's got less than half the # of pages. It's truly pathetic, but then again, I couldn't write my column forever, and Eileen D. didn't really think like her genius husband anyway. As a result, the GT of today is a joke. There were sponsors who bought ad space back then that would never even give it a thought without my Undeniable Truth column. And the reason it's a skeleton paper today is because the sponsors said bye-bye. Chuck knew how to run a successful paper. His wife does not.

So Gaming Today downsizing had more to do with the lack of Rob's column than with the internet stressing a weekly tabloid as a news source. Interesting theory. It also had nothing to do with the Las Vegas economic crash of 10 years ago. It had to do with Rob's column.

Now here's something I don't quite understand. I don't see any difference between Gaming Today content today and 20 years ago. Rob, explain the vast differences in the paper under "genius" Chuck and "non-genius" Eileen. The only difference between the two is really the lack of your column, which leads us to the inevitable conclusion that not maintaining Rob's column clearly profiled Eileen as a "non-genius."

I will be sure to pass this forum posting onto Gaming Today, so they can appreciate their current folly. Maybe they will reward me with a free subscription.

Rob, one other question. That comment, "There were sponsors who bought ad space back then that would never even give it a thought without my Undeniable Truth column."

Would you care to name one still living? You know, one of them thar sponsors who would not advertise in GT without your column?

I find that quite a claim. Sounds almost narcissistic bordering on nuts. So could you name one? You said "sponsors" plural, so you must have some folks in mind. I know you wouldn't make that up off the top of your head.

Could we have a name? So, you know, we research types could verify the undeniable truth about it?


Thanks in advance.

Your friend,

Bob

P.S. If Rob doesn't provide a name, you know that I'll be dropping into the GT office to hand them this post and see if they know any sponsors who might have ceased advertising because of a "lack of Rob."

Too many words again, which means you're failing yourself. I told you your writing style is poor. You should heed the word. Lucky for you this place is loaded up with doofuses.

You either dodged the fact about the paper's significant size reduction--or you are making your statements up just like you try to get away with on your so-called resume'.

It would be nice if you went to see Eileen when you can afford to get to LV again. It'll make her think back to GT's glory days, and force her to again recognize her husband's greatness. But alas....I also can't help but think of the fiasco of words you'll once again subject us to as you try so hard to make some point.

[Alan Mendelson]

Rob Singer I am not going to respond to you, now or ever again.

Frankly everyone should ignore you. You make zero positive contributions here. You waste our time.

Anything you post here has two purposes: one is self-glorification. The other is to put down others.

However, if you'd like to phone me or meet up sometime, I'd be happy to, because then the real you will come out from behind the curtain.

[redietz]

I don't disagree that's what it is today. It's a shell of its former self, and after just one year of publishing my column it enjoyed it's most popular and prolific time ever--straight through until the day I quit sending in articles.

Today, the paper has not only shrunk in length & width--it's got less than half the # of pages. It's truly pathetic, but then again, I couldn't write my column forever, and Eileen D. didn't really think like her genius husband anyway. As a result, the GT of today is a joke. There were sponsors who bought ad space back then that would never even give it a thought without my Undeniable Truth column. And the reason it's a skeleton paper today is because the sponsors said bye-bye. Chuck knew how to run a successful paper. His wife does not.

So Gaming Today downsizing had more to do with the lack of Rob's column than with the internet stressing a weekly tabloid as a news source. Interesting theory. It also had nothing to do with the Las Vegas economic crash of 10 years ago. It had to do with Rob's column.

Now here's something I don't quite understand. I don't see any difference between Gaming Today content today and 20 years ago. Rob, explain the vast differences in the paper under "genius" Chuck and "non-genius" Eileen. The only difference between the two is really the lack of your column, which leads us to the inevitable conclusion that not maintaining Rob's column clearly profiled Eileen as a "non-genius."

I will be sure to pass this forum posting onto Gaming Today, so they can appreciate their current folly. Maybe they will reward me with a free subscription.

Rob, one other question. That comment, "There were sponsors who bought ad space back then that would never even give it a thought without my Undeniable Truth column."

Would you care to name one still living? You know, one of them thar sponsors who would not advertise in GT without your column?

I find that quite a claim. Sounds almost narcissistic bordering on nuts. So could you name one? You said "sponsors" plural, so you must have some folks in mind. I know you wouldn't make that up off the top of your head.

Could we have a name? So, you know, we research types could verify the undeniable truth about it?


Thanks in advance.

Your friend,

Bob

P.S. If Rob doesn't provide a name, you know that I'll be dropping into the GT office to hand them this post and see if they know any sponsors who might have ceased advertising because of a "lack of Rob."

Too many words again, which means you're failing yourself. I told you your writing style is poor. You should heed the word. Lucky for you this place is loaded up with doofuses.

You either dodged the fact about the paper's significant size reduction--or you are making your statements up just like you try to get away with on your so-called resume'.

It would be nice if you went to see Eileen when you can afford to get to LV again. It'll make her think back to GT's glory days, and force her to again recognize her husband's greatness. But alas....I also can't help but think of the fiasco of words you'll once again subject us to as you try so hard to make some point.

Rob, how is the content of Gaming Today different today than 20 years ago, your column aside? Not number of articles, but content?

Do you seriously think the size reduction in Gaming Today is due more to the lack of your column than to print downsizing in general or the 2008 Las Vegas recession?

"When I can afford to get to LV again?" What the heck does that mean? You know I usually give you a heads up so we can meet-and-greet.

[RS__]

Rob Singer I am not going to respond to you, now or ever again.

Frankly everyone should ignore you. You make zero positive contributions here. You waste our time.

Anything you post here has two purposes: one is self-glorification. The other is to put down others.

+1

[Alan Mendelson]

Not number of articles, but content?

Isn't the number of articles relevant to the question of content?