Originally Posted by arcimede$ View Post
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
Originally Posted by arcimede$ View Post
As usual when Alan is made to look foolish he tries to change the subject. You supported Regnis statement so please explain to everyone how the peeker could know "at least one die is a 2" when he doesn't see both of the die.
Are you fucking insane? He only has to see ONE die to make the statement "at least one die is a two." You don't have to see both dice. And in the question it is stated that the "peeker" truthfully says one die is a 2.

So what the fuck is your problem?
Why didn't you answer my question, Alan. Instead you more or less admitted you know you are wrong by swearing. If he sees only one die and it is a 6, he cannot KNOW whether the other die is a 2. Therefore, he can not "truthfully" say whether or not one die is a 2. He HAS to see both die to "truthfully" answer the question.

Face-palm.
We fucking went through this before. Of course the peeker has to see a 2 in order to make the statement "at least one die is a two."

You made this ridiculous comment the first time responding to regnis who discussed seeing a 2.

Then you tried to twist your words.

Quit it. You pulled this same shit in your battles with Singer over the years and I'm not going to fall for it.

Fuck off.

And you cheated on your taxes.