You guys keep making this ridiculous statement:

Originally Posted by a2a3dseddie View Post
Since we don't know which dice has landed on the 2, we need to consider all combinations
If you have two dice, and you know one die is a 2, how many possible combinations could there be? There are only two dice. One is a 2.

It doesn't matter which of the two dice is showing the 2.

Maybe on a chart showing the combinations of dice it matters, but when you are dealing with two physical dice it doesn't matter which is showing a two.

Take your minds off your charts and graphs and put two dice in front of you. Set one of the dice as a 2. What's the answer to the problem? It's one out of six.

Now, set the other die to a 2. What's the answer now? It's still 1/6.

Set both dice to a 2. What's the answer now? It's still 1/6.

We are told one of the two dice is a 2. That means ignore your charts and graphs showing all the 11 combinations with a 2. Ignore them. Put them aside. They don't count anymore. If you don't believe me ask regnis. Ask your mailman. Ask your six year old kid.

Now, regarding Arc. He made claims here about all his winnings and when he submitted his tax returns to prove his winnings the only thing he declared were a couple of $4,000 royals. He admitted here on the forum that he did not include his non W2G wins. He admitted it, mickey.

Arc, there is no requirement to see both dice. Stop your argument.