BS AP's

[redietz]

I see the AP bs is flowing once again.

FACT: Any casino who offers a 150% loss rebate would advertise the hell out of it. And not identifying where it is or was instantly deletes any credibility they thought they had. Making believe it's some super special ATM withdrawal secret is as stupid as it sounds. AP's are so much into their own state-of-mind egos that common sense never even dawns on them.

I've seen these rebates and I've seen a 200% loss rebate. THEY WERE IN BIG BOLD LETTERS ON HUGE CASINO SIGNS OUTSIDE THE CASINOS. Why? BECAUSE THEY MAKE MONEY ON THESE THINGS. Any promotion makes money for the casinos in one way or the other.

So to pretend some phantom 150% loss rebate promo is worth paying for the info over, is the same as some slug AP saying it only for the sake of saying it. And I'm sure some phony armchair gambler like Axel gets wet over claiming these type of things.

Wise up, idiots.

Rob, I am in no way defending APs here, but I find it necessary to point out that your argument as written above is a classic example of being logically fallacious, an invalid argument, a non sequitur.

You are arguing that casinos offer 200% rebates because they make money overall on them. That may be true. Personally, I think in some long-term sense, it is true.

Your argument, as far as I can tell, is that APs must therefore be lying that they make money on these things. That doesn't, however, logically follow unless you consider AP-style of play to be identical to the entire market style of play.

I don't think you've ever stated this, and it can be demonstrated that AP play is not identical to the entire market style of play, so this would render your conclusion logically fallacious.

In addition, you seem to be implying that APs, after exploiting the rebate offers, fall prey to undisciplined play and eventual losses, as might the general population. This, however, by definition, is not what APs do. So there is a logical contradiction here.

You also have no evidence or data to suggest that APs play the same as the general population. That is problematic to your claims.