Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
Kewlj is now saying there is a difference in visibility between seat #2 and the middle seat.

I didn't see any difference.
That is bullshit, Alan! Kewlj is NOT NOW saying it. Re-read post #321, posted before you made your little midnight run, where you intentionally posted a view from a different angle.

You didn't see any difference, because you don't want to see any difference. It's not like you are looking objectively is it? You made up your mind and went searching for an angle that backs your views. Didn't matter that it was not what was discussed.

Let me ask you something: How in the hell would someone sit in one of the first two seats, with their back to the table "next" to them and be able to see the cards at that table. Is that really what you think I was saying? Because I think I made it pretty clear that you need to be in the middle of the table so you can see both the table to your right and the table to your left with just a slight turn of the head or eyes. Remember??...we had that whole discussion about the head and eyes being able to move??

It is you who changed the story and continue to do so.

As a matter of fact, let me ask anyone else who read the thread: Is there anyone who didn't understand that I specifically said seated at the middle of the table?