WRONG! Any time there are two blackjack tables next to each other, the person in the end seats (1st base and 3rd base) have their back to the table next to them. The table is curved....it HAS to be that way. If you are sitting at first base (1st seat), your back will be right up against the back of the person playing third base (last seat) at the next table. Even your blurry picture shows that.Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
There may be a little bit of room at some casinos, but most are right up against each other....actually 'pinched in'. Even if there is a bit of room, you are still back to back with that player. This is one of the reasons that I avoid those corner seats. I don't want to get 'pinched in', should a quick exit become necessary. In addition, at either corner (1st base or 3rd base), your back will not only be to the table behind you, but half the pit will be to your back. I want a clear view of pit activities.
All those other "variables" that you mentioned are nonsense. That's just you looking for an issue. Those variables are non issues for experienced counters. And as I said at the very beginning, yes occasionally you may miss a card or two, being temp blocked or timing or whatever. You would like your count at the second table to be as accurate as possible, but if it is off a couple, that is acceptable. All you are looking for is a significantly better count at that second table, presenting a stronger opportunity than the table you are currently playing.
I don't know why I am bothering to explain this a 4th or 5th time now. Tracking two tables isn't anything new nor ground-breaking and it isn't that difficult for experienced counters, playing a reasonably simple count. Good spotters on decent teams are tracking 3,4,5 tables, looking for that same significant count to call in the big player. Tracking a second table while playing one, is kind of like acting as your own spotter.
But you will continue to choose not to believe and challenge....so do your thing.
Reply With Quote