What redietz is really saying here is that since you (Alan) refuse to be honest, refuse to be the objective person that you like to paint yourself as, and that redietz trusted you to be, that you then forward to someone that does have those honest and objective qualities.Originally Posted by redietz
I don't have Dan's address.
Redietz there are fair use rules for copyright material. You could easily and safely post photos of magazine headlines with bylines and cover photos of mags with your name. I know the law. Just do it.
You're making a big deal out of nothing. I said all along I never doubted you. IS THERE ANYONE HERE BESIDES ROB SINGER WHO DOUBTS REDIETZ?
At some point I'll go to the office.
Only you and Belly think he`s a giant( Belly would quite literally like to find out)....I`m quite certain most everyone else thinks hes a F`n moronOriginally Posted by Alan Mendelson
then if you really think he is a F*n moron why do you care if he challenges redietz and his credentials?
I don't challenge redietz and his credentials. I told this to redietz. Do you really give a F what Rob says?
Alan doesn't have my address, that's correct.
However, I also don't understand why Alan can't have his associate Tony just send the materials to Alan's home.
If it does get returned to redietz, I volunteer to be the next one to receive it, and I will open up the package and examine whatever is supposed to be examined.
Check out my poker forum, and weekly internet radio show at http://pokerfraudalert.com
Because we have other things to do. It's not one of our priorities. I believe redietz and always have believed him. If this continues soon we will question whether Dan is really Dan.
Stop lying. I said I've done this.Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
No amount of proof is ever good enough for you. We say you can count two tables when it's not crowded, you say we need X-ray vision. You don't need to be able to see through people if there are no people. We say some promo is good and here's the math, you say oh no, but you can still lose. Mickey says a double 4oak promo is good and you say you've gone a whole trip without a 4oak.
Alan, you might actually be worse than Rob when it comes to gambling and logic. I think Rob knows deep down he's full of shit, especially given his posts about enjoying being a troll on forums. I don't think you realize how stupid much of the stuff is that you say.
But hey, keep donating your money to Caesars & Bellagio. I appreciate that, as an AP, since the more money a casino makes, the more they are (likely) able to give out in promotions or at least not be worried so much if they're losing money somewhere else. I'm sure the casino's appreciate it too. Although, we'd prefer if you donated your money to more of the off-strip casinos, since that's at least where I tend to play more.
Last edited by RS__; 09-01-2017 at 03:33 AM.
Rob is not a gaming expert.Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmRob is not a gaming expert.Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Now mickey, let's not be too quick to judgement here. If one uses "gaming" as a verb, it means "manipulate (a situation) in a way that is unscrupulous." Such as "it was easy for a few big loudmouths to game the forum" or "it was easy for a few big companies to game the system." In this sense, as a verb, Rob could possibly be a "gaming expert."
Now, in the usual gambling sense, Rob is not a gaming expert. There's more gambling math in one of your posts than in all 5000 of Rob's.
Always Helpful Editor Bob
P.S. "Gaming expert" is a really weird phrase. Rob occasionally says (wrongly, as usual) that I claim to be a "gaming expert." I never use that phrase. It's way too broad to apply to anyone in a gambling context. I do not know anyone except video gamers who self identify as "gaming experts," and I have read National Conference on Gambling and Risk-Taking volumes. Outside of Alan and Rob, I haven't encountered anyone who attaches that phrase to themselves or others in gambling contexts. Not even Shackleford or John Ferguson (Stanford friggin' Wong). It's a really odd and overly broad phrase. I do, however, lead a sheltered life, so maybe people call themselves "gaming experts" in the privacy of their homes and without video games.
Last edited by redietz; 09-01-2017 at 08:42 AM.
Hahaha! There's only ONE thing that Alan might have a chance affecting your pathetic life with. And my guess s you're never gonna get it from a decent person.Originally Posted by kewlJahhh...NO...I don't!Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
I don't have to prove anything to you sir and frankly there is no benefit to me attempting to do so. You are free to believe whatever you like. Whatever you chose to believe is completely irrelevant. It isn't going to effect me, my life, or livelihood one bit.
The apparent thrill over the redietz "pr packet" is overrated. So many times it's been stated that he could submit any accolades on any named individual he wishes to. But unless and until he provides proof of identity to match the name he submits, his packet is worth about as much any of a dozen or so lies kew has spewed here.
And coach & Alan make an even better point. Redietz could have taken care if all this far easier by posting the necessary information right here. There's a reason he continues to duck that. That's why he continues to get excoriated, and it is obviously well deserved.
I stand by my belief that redietz, who's really only here to argue with Alan and to try and scratch his unreachable itch over me. In fact, he's run his course at least three or four times, which can be determined by how predictable and corny his posts are.
Good catch biloxibill! Thanks!
LOL -- hey, Rob. I have a great idea. If you're so sure copyright laws don't apply, why don't I send you the material and you can post it all online yourself and take legal responsibility for it? I already offered to send it to you -- all I need is your home address.
Once again I BELIEVE REDIETZ.
As far as the copyright laws go there are fair use rules. Redietz could easily photograph article titles with credits, and magazine covers with headlines and excerpts of magazine articles and photos of book covers and NO copyright laws will be broken.
Redietz I told you this multiple times.
In fact if the envelope contains photo copies of the full articles you already violated the copyright laws. Unless you sent me published originals I should destroy what you sent because I don't want you to get in trouble redietz.
I remember because Gnomon Copy, which had a store in State College (Penn State), had to change the way they did things. Up to that point, professors would have students get a copy made of various articles rather than buying the entire textbooks containing the articles. That went out the window.Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Now, you're allowed to make a single copy yourself for personal use, but it's not something to distribute. So the copies I sent to Alan still have to be considered "mine," or I risk violating the spirit of the laws. I'm just letting him read "my copy."
If you take, say, a AAA map to Kinko's these days, they are supposed to refuse you if you ask them to make a copy. You'll be allowed to make the copy yourself for personal use on one of their machines, but they will not make it for you.
Rob can post the stuff, however. He says it's okay.
Gosh, if redietz sent me his "personal copy" then I can't copy them. I'm not even sure under the "fair use rules" that I could take a headline with a byline for use on the website.
However, redietz could take a photo from the original published works of his byline and put that photo on this forum under the fair use rules.
By the way, I am very familiar with the copyright rules and fair use rules from my decades in TV news. The news business was not exempt from the copyright laws. So when we put videos and still photos and graphics of copyrighted material on TV in the news, including clips of audio including music clips, we had to follow the fair use rules.
In my Infomercial business there are also no exemptions of the copyright laws and in fact, the fair use rules are even more stringent. To avoid any problem we NEVER use copyrighted material. In fact, with certain clients we avoid use of all trademarked items and trademarks. I recall asking a consumer who we were interviewing to change their shirt because it had the logo of a sports team, and I remember putting a piece of masking tape over the Apple logo on a computer.
Now that redietz has told everyone including me that he sent me a personal copy, my hands are tied about any public display. I don't want to get Dan in trouble. He's the publisher of this forum, not me. You're welcome, Dan.
Redietz is doing what he does best: create a mountain out of a mole hill for the express reason of inviting confusion and bewilderment so nothing will be exposed about him. And for all we know, this charade was worked out with Alan in advance, where he never really sent Alan a thing.
When you think about bit, Alan knows and knew all this copyright crap well, so if it was real what was the point anyway? Now all this discussion does us perpetuate the hoax that is redietz.
The envelope is real Rob. I'm sure it contains what redietz says it contains.
Exactly what I'd have said to de-escalate the situation.....if I didn't enjoy keeping the pressure on redietz, that is.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
