RS___ the English language changes. But more importantly, is this guy NOT a terrorist because he wasn't waving a flag? Are you really going to put this asshole on the same level as a bum who hits someone over the head to steal their wallet?
There comes a point where the intensity of the crime (numbers hurt, numbers killed, property threatened, fear instilled in the public, response from the local and national governments) raises a criminal act to one of terrorism.
That you would challenge that this guy was a terrorist shocks me. This guy was ready to destroy a city. Did it matter if he carried a flag? Not one bit. His motive and actions alone put him in the category of terrorist.
As I pointed out, a year ago the word "selfie" was not in the dictionary. But before it was in the dictionary did you know what a selfie was?
Are you really going to say this mother fucker was not a terrorist?
Tell that to the 22,000 people being shot at. Tell that to the families of the 58 who were killed. Tell that to the 500+ who were hurt. Tell that to people like me who were locked in a bar and not allowed to leave for four hours until the police gave us the all clear. We were all terrorized.




Reply With Quote