Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
Originally Posted by JSTAT View Post
Another idiot who dares to dismiss Munchkin
I want it on record that it was you who described yourself as an idiot, not me.

I am not going to say too much about you baccarat card counting thing because I don't play baccarat or know anything about it. I don't even know how to play.

BUT. I do know that much like with blackjack what some 5 years ago, you have claims involving a count you have named after yourself that almost every other math AP disputes. It was that way 5 years ago with your JStat count and blackjack. Almost every single math blackjack guy disputed what you were claiming.

Now in this little clip, and I am not a fan of your self serving clips, you have Munchkin and by proxy, Ed Thorpe disputing your claims. That is some experienced math guys. So lets start with you telling us how much you have made both playing blackjack and baccarat using this Jstat count that only you think is beneficial. If the heavyweight gambling math guys are all wrong....how much have you made. We need to know that to start the conversation.

And BTW, I would have preferred you started your own conversation about this topic instead of hijacking mine, but what's done is done. Give us a profit number that you have made when all the math guys say you can't.
I've challenged Richard Munchkin, Anthony Curtis, Norman Wattenberger and others to debate, but these gatekeepers for the casino industry refuse to do it! Check my Twitter timeline to confirm this. Also my video below made in 2009 challenges Hi-Lo Count developer Julian Braun for not including the 7,8,9's in his computer simulation analysis of Harvey Dubner's discovery in Ed Thorp's "Beat The Dealer" in the 1966 revision. This mistake inspired me to side count the 8's and 9's which also helps the Hi-Lo Count player. The dealer will bust more often and our double downs on 10/11 will improve with an excess of them. The original "Beat the Dealer" (1962) was damn good and provided blackjack card counting advantage plays in the entire book. The casinos panicked and Thorp likely sold out to the casinos by providing a losing count in the 1966 revision.