Peter, I wonder what's going to happen when Frank Kneeland concludes that there's no merit to the Singer strategy in terms of ongoing positiive financial results. I'm guessing he'll be reclassified as just another "addicted" AP'ers who need to write books and consult with casinos to actually earn a living.
It's funny as hell to see what's happening on vpFree's board. Singer has been allowed to post there as long as he doesn't promote/comment on his system. If you never met this guy nor read his typical tirades, you'd actually think he's a nice guy based on what he writes there. He's calm, insightful and even witty. I can see through this as clear as day.....he's sucking up to Kneeland as being his last hope to convince that his system has merit.
Rob, having the most viewed post due to the reason that most people despise you isn't something that I'd be proud of. Peter does make a very sound point....where are your supporters and more importantly, those disciples who you have personally trained who are consistently making money with your system? You claim to have taught about 500 people. Presumably, if they follow your system, they should be able to replicate your results, right? So, there are 500 or so people walking around with the knowledge of how to make just less than $100K/yr. and to do this in about 43 sessions. Do I have all this correct? I hope so as I'm using your numbers that you've provided on this very board. I'd love to meet one or two of these people in the flesh.
Unlike you, I don't know of many AP'ers who claim to make $100K/yr. playing vp. They may be out there but not in the circles I run. If I could make $100K/yr. gambling, I'd like give up my primary gig. Then again, I'd probably play 86 sessions a year and earn $200K....I'm a bit more ambitious than most
.
Not to harp on this but you claim to have a system that makes $100K/yr. and you're happy to share it for free and you've had 500 people already take you up on this offer. If this were possible, you'd have a vast majority of these 500 telling all of us non-believers how much they're making and with enough verification, others would be jumping on board this money making system and you'd be hearalded as the smartest gambler of all time.
Can you see why this doesn't pass the stink test with the overwhelming majority of people?
Alan, just had a thought that might cut thru the chase with the never ending debate. How about this....
I'm not sure if I have all the facts straight but this is what I recall. Rob says that he needs about $57-58K bankroll for his strategy. To get an unbiased review of his system, how about a little experiment? Designate someone to be the player. I might suggest Slappy but you might have someone else in mind. Rob escrows the required bankroll and you front the player an equivalent amount of actual bankroll. Under Rob's tutelage and perhaps even his direct supervision, the player plays the 40 or so sessions that Rob deems is necessary for his system to be financially successful. If the player wins, Rob gets the profit....the equivalent of him having a free employee out making money for him. If his system loses, your losses are reimbursed by the escrow amount. Where does this get good for you? Well, just think about it....you can cut an upfront promotion deal with Rob where you would actually produce his full system on video and sell it exclusively on your website. Rob makes money on these sales and you get a cut along with all the enhanced traffic to the website. You can even video some of the individual sessions and the player can even have a blog where he can post his daily experiences and results. Once again, unless I'm missing something, this has to be a win-win if Rob's system has merit. If it doesn't, perhaps we can finally put all the bickering to rest and Rob will have to concede that his system doesn't work.
Your thoughts?
Dan