My concern is that Washington D.C. has a larger pool from which to randomly draw examiners. California probably doesn't license them because it's the most scientifically progressive state and considers it junk science. Same as why they're not admissible in court.
Check and see how many operators are in Nevada versus D.C. I'd rather go with the higher quality pool of operators, which I suspect is in D.C. Also, questions will obviously be limited to what is specifically claimed on the www.IntegritySports archived site, claimed on this forum, or general, such as "Are you ahead lifetime gambling?" or "Are you ahead lifetime sports gambling?"
Obviously, I'm not going to discuss other people, with the exception of the "Did you work for Billy Walters?" That was mentioned on this forum and is fair game.