Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
Rob has stated over and over again his tactics generate an 85% success rate. That means it failed 15% of the time. 500 casino visits in 10 years. He would have met his win goal 425 times and lost $57,200 a total of 75 times.

Out of the 425 times times he succeeded what would be the average win to overcome the 75 times he lost $57,200 and also make $1,000,000.

75 X 57,200 = $4,290,000
Add $100,000,000 to it for a total of $5,290,000
Divide 5,290,000 by 425 and Rob's average winning session would have to be $12,447.

He claims a session averaged about 4 hours. That would be the highest average hourly rate I've ever heard of. That's $3,111 an hour.

And he says he quit using this system because it affected the taxes on his measly social security check.

How many of you would quit using a system that produced such a win?
OK you math and strategy genius. If you, again, read what I posted here at least a dozen times, you'd see that the largest ever loss was around $35,000 which happened once, and the avg loss/losing session of SPS was around $6000, while the avg. winning session was higher. You'd also see where I only played nowhere near 500 SPS sessions, and I played around 350 sessions in 10 years. About 100 of those were RTT and ARTT.

So go back and try to make up some more numbers that make you jeep from going insane.

"I've read his strategy a thousand times and I know how he says he does it inside out" :
If your biggest losing session was just $35,000 then you never played your martingale all the way out like you have said over and over and over again that you did.