What's my edge in craps?

[kewlJ]

It's only because I challenged kewlj's claim about counting two tables

Nope that's NOT what it is all about. It's about you and electricity stealing, ugly cousin Eddie supporting mathematically impossible claims, like 18 y.o.'s in a row, and "willing" 900k in wins from a negative expectation game, and supporting voodoo concepts like progression systems to over come negative expectation, while at the same time, going against and challenging the mathematics that real AP's use to gain and advantage. Maybe what you are is anti-Math. Anti-proven mathematically sound techniques. Anti-reality and pro-alternative reality.

It's only because I challenged kewlj's claim about counting two tables that he later conceded that his count was not complete and he would miss cards. Of course when you count at one table all cards are visible.

If kewlj says he doesn't need a 100% count to switch tables, i.e. moving to the table with the partial count, then more power to him.

Yes, I DO SAY THAT! But, it's not only me, but many proven known professional and proven successful blackjack players, like Richard Munchkin and Don Schlesinger that also state they do this or have done this when the opportunity presents itself. Just because YOU, Mr. Shyster, gambling addict, aren't familiar with something doesn't mean it isn't so. I have news for you numbnuts...you don't know everything. As a matter of fact....near as I can tell, you know very little about anything.

I'm not a blackjack player but if he says only a partial count is needed who am I to argue?

EXACTLY! YOU DON"T KNOW. But that hasn't stopped you from wrongly arguing your point for almost a year now has it? How about you take your own advise...."who are you to argue"...and just shut the fuck up.