Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post

Red, as much as you detest these things about me, there is only one instance of my being banned that was proven, and that's because it was published in Gaming Today. Perhaps, because you have said how many times you went over to GT to check up on me, you could check with Eileen D. to review my past columns in the 2004/2005 timeline. The title has the word "Bellagio" in it.

And since I am the ONLY professional vp player or otherwise to have ever proven I was banned, it shouldn't be difficult to ascertain the fact that there have been--and currently are--other bannings. Or, you could believe what the AP crowd likes to do on forums and elsewhere: claim they or other "strong ap's they know" have been "backed off or restricted" just because they're, well, AP's!
I don't remember ever seeing anything written in Gaming Today that was negative toward a casino. Rags like that who depend on selling advertising to survive just don't do that. So DiRocco made an exception in your case? I don't think so.
There you go again mickey making believe you've been part of the gaming scene all along.

Since when would publishing a player/columnist's ban letter be considered anti-casino--especially from someone who'd been writing about being a consistently successful hi-limit VP player for years leading up to it? This is where your lack of education shows all over again.
All casino execs swear they don't throw out players that win.It's bad publicity so they lie about it. Remember Dancer and Suncoast? And the dozen other players they 86'd. You helped facilitate the Suncoast lying about 86'ing them right here in this forum. You swore up and down that the Suncoast doesn't bounce players that win....and Dancer and the others were lying. Every single one of them lying. Now you want us to believe that you were 86'd for winning. Fuck off, idiot.