Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
Originally Posted by slingshot View Post
I repeat: I can't fathom why Rob or Alan would even WANT to be here! The thread on the player's stats screen spoke volumes and was dissed off as inconsequential. When these two are gone, it turns into a vile name calling war- not any better than when they're present.
You learned a lot in the Singer school of mudslinging. Rob taught you well. Every game had a small sample space. About 200,000 coin-in would be about one royal cycle. Two of the games the house lost money. But the stats pretty much are inconsequential because the sample spaces are too damn small, period. There is no disrespect in that conclusion. However, Rob's loser protege felt it necessary to say the stats were disrespected. Get the fuck out.
OK, here is what you stated in the other thread:

Wow! Just glancing my usual quick overview before moving back to other forums and emails and I actually enjoyed this thread enough to go thru it all! All good


Frankly, this thread was awesome after the initial negativity was moved to a separate thread by Dan. Funny, the initial thread is 1 1/4 pages long and the separate thread is now close to nine full pages. There are no vile comments in the shortened thread. You may want to visit the "moved" thread. It was moved due to the first two pages. Based on this, I think your premise is wrong.