Originally Posted by
Rob.Singer
Red you have no clue of what is--only what you want to be. And it's all because of a very poor understanding of the facts and a hatred towards me. You are, in effect, kew's daddy.
I've been successful for almost exactly the reason stated by Alan (and everything he just wrote is true): my play strategy gives some hands that would be a push or smaller winner the opportunity to be bigger winners, by using a small trade-off in EV after careful risk analyses have been performed. Most of the time they do not work. Sometimes they do, and for the simple fact that you never know what's going to happen on a VP machine when the draw button is pushed. And because my play increases in both denomination and game volatility, when these "sometimes" come it makes for a very nice payday.
You're problem seems to have always been that I say success using this method is being taught to others as if it is assured to continue. Well it is, and it is because I know it works from having had it work just as I developed and expected it to, over all these years. That's called prediction based on historical data. It's not defying any of your sacred math. It's simply using common sense with a whole lot of math and money mgmt./proper bankroll/absence of greed to accomplish win goals and then utilize extreme discipline and determination to keep the profits.
None of your university math professors would ever think of disagreeing with any of this. How do I know this? Because they have the same education I have.
Wise up.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote